Governments are expendable / ··cultures are irreplaceable.
The decline of academics, ethics, & subsequent literature. And it's influence on politics.
If you follow mainstream politics, a disturbing trend has gained widescale acceptance. The most prominent legislators openly support Women's Groups. In fact, there are probably congressional members within your local area who publicly announce allegiance to Them. YOU most likely have a top official in your community, who's a blind follower to feminist dictation. ...And, this reaches the highest levels of government. President Bill Clinton & Vice President Al Gore where supporters of N.O.W.
President Barrack Obama & Vice President Joseph Biden also endorse feminized policies. After reading the following material, please consider a few basic issues: 1) most importantly, why do our politicians openly support these feminists? 2) why does the News Media share similar attitudes? 3) how could most journalists accept this type of extremism as everyday normality? 4) why does mainstream television allow prime time interviews with die hard feminists? It reaches the most trusted programs. 5) How could such bizarre literature become perennial best-sellers? 6) anytime a discussion develops, ordinary women will defend these bizarre authors. And, even though several thousand books targeted against men, the average woman still claims evidence to the contrary . ....And, despite everything, they always maintain this position.
REMINDER: Our most trusted politicians are blind followers of N.O.W. So, keep ALL these factors in mind, while reading the following material:
Quotations from mainstream Feminists:
"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometime gain from the
-Catherine Comins (Assistant Dean of Vassar College)
"In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from
families and communally raise them"
--Dr. Marry Jo Bane (assistant PROFESSOR Wellesfry College.)
"we, as women, are infinitely superior to men".
--Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
"The ratio of men to women must be radically reduced such that men approximate only 10% of the population".
Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the
Women's Movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for
women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage."
"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination
of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that
will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males."
-Mary Daly. PROFESSOR at Boston College.
"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in
his mouth , like an apple in the mouth of a pig."
--Andrea Dwarkin (Author)
"Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are
religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure,
accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the
earth, called it 'Her.' Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous
gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human
Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the
inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman."
"Rape is the primary heterosexual model for sexual relating. Rape is the
primary emblem of romantic love.
Note: Andrea is another unprincipled author who manages to find willing publishers. Thus, enabling her to distribute such material to a wide audience.
"Woman has a capacity for understanding & compassion which a man structurally does not have, he cannot have it because he is incapable of it".
--Barbara Jordon (CONGRESSwoman)
"My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little
sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome
young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and
I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care.
What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply
-Marilyn French (author) (....if you wanna call it that.??)
"How will the family unit be destroyed? .. . the demand alone will throw
the whole ideology of the family into question, so that women can begin
establishing a community of work with each other and we can fight collectively.
Women will feel freer to leave their husbands and become economically
independent, either through a job or welfare."
--Roxanne Dunbar (another Shabby author)
"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the
Women's Movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for
women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage."
--Sheila Cronan (Author)
(Have you ever wondered how this garbage gets published ????)
[Lesbianism is] an ideological, political and philosophical means of
liberation of all women from heterosexual tyranny Heterosexuality is maintained and contained through terror,and the spray of
--Cheryl Clark (author)
(Here's a Wake-up-Call:) (your mothers & girlfriends have probably purchased literature of this magnitude.)
I, personally, have taken the position
that I will not appear with any man publicly, where it could possibly be
interpreted that we were friends." -
--Ti Grace Atkinson
(This phrase sounds familiar to the treatment boys receive from female classmates. She usually regards him as the lower class)
"All men are rapists, that's all they are"
--Marilyn French (Adviser to PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE AL GORE). --------------- Commentary: did you ever notice how women spend a huge amount of time using the term "rape"? This substantiates our long-held theories: She apparently prefers this issue amongst all others. It serves at a powerful statement, expressing their desire for control.. And it specifically surrounds one narrow subject.
"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" "Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice."
Also note: Regarding various Quotes spanning decades. There are frequent contradictions.
........Sometimes, they accuse males of being predators, while other occasions, they promote forced lesbianism.
........Or, they accuse males of brutality, while showing support for matriarchs guilty of hideous crimes.
"Sometimes we have to take scary methods in order to achieve worthwhile results". ---------------- "It's all about saying, because you are a woman, I'm gonna put you in this promotion."
The following information reviews the misconduct of various teachers. Most are trusted Professors at highly respected universities. When reading this material, you'll quickly notice their level of corruption. And, the apparent lack of concern by the academic community. most importantly: please remember that many politicians blindly support these women. (note: Our legislators don't necessarily subscribe to such radical extremism, However, there's mainstream acceptance for these women. And, Legislators allow them to influence their policies. That's a disturbing thought. ........So, please read on:
The Brilliant author, Bernard Chapin; discusses his experience with a lesbian College Professor. I entered the classroom. and, before too long ... "teacher and students melded into one, for the purpose of degrading Men, ...White People, ....and Western Civilization as a whole". Mr. Chapin then addressed this matter to the administrators. But, nothing was done. So, Teacher continues using her position to promote Feminist dogma. More importantly; please notice how she also attacks an entire race. A connection should be made between the two seemingly unrelated matters. There seems to be a bond amongst radical Academic hatemongers. Their curriculum specifically attacks men, while promoting feminism. But, at the same time, they're also hostile toward Caucasian persons. And, Women's Groups epitomize racism against White folks.
Most of the following information is highly influenced by a phenominal book titled, The Professors, by David Horowitz. Aside from that, our groups (Men's Rights: Social Awareness), has been aware of this problem since 1982. Long before 'Women's Studies' ever became a factor, Feminists had begun corrupting our schools.
The following material shows just how extreme things have become.
Back during the early 1980's, Women's History Month was introduced into grade-school textbooks. And, people said it was harmless. But, this has since been proven wrong.
Here are just a few examples of the types of Professors who indoctrinate our students:
(sizing errors are causing the below material to appear too large)
Professor Alison Jaggar, a Professor of Philosophy, at University
only was she a chair leader of the Women's Studies Department, she actually
helped in establishing it as a primary course.During the early 1980's, (perhaps 1983), this university was already
offering Women's Studies.However, it
was considered part of "American Studies".
In 1995, she helped to "liberate" this course into its own stature.She considers herself to be a "social feminist" and an activist speaking
out against patriarchy. (These women typically speak in an abstract, poetic language.)
She seeks to eradicate a supposed
male-dominated culture of everyday life. --Feminists repeatedly claim that women are the oppressed, Even though, daily routines witnessed throughout America suggest otherwise.(Please remember, she's speaking amidst a
society controlled by Feminists,with
totalitarian viewpoint. After all, she
considered the previous 1980's "Woman's Studies" program to be a personalinjustice).
...Her teachings are often contradictory. ---She promotes Woman's
Conferences, While claiming to smash patriarchy.
...She believes in "Gender Blind"
Marxism. ----While also stating that
everything should be interpreted from the standpoint of women.
She defends a position which
solely represents the interests of women. But, her viewpoint is justified because "the standpoint of the
oppressed represents the interests of the totality". And, thus deserving of those privileges.
After reviewing feminist techniques for several decades...It's quite noticeable, there's a
repetitive use of the term "Oppression" on their part.So, this seems to be the word ofpreference.
Ironically, if so chosen, Feminists could certainly teach feminine superiority. and it would not raise an eyebrow......end footnote.
In 1995, Prof Jaggar headed a Conference
on "Feminism, Epistemology, and Ethics". (Notice how, they're able to present their opinions as organized common-law.) Her most recognized paper is
titled, "One is not born a man".Those are some qualifications, huh ???)
HERE ARE THE MOST NOTABLE FACTS: Her literature discusses the
possibility of "biological transformation".
She believes that one woman should inseminate another. She also believes that men
should be socially constructed to lactate, in order to "share parental
She's even suggested that, a
fertilized ova should be forcibly transplanted into the male.(under the pretext of equality).And, always under circumstances which benefit a female spouse. Hollywood
has also glamorized this issue. Claiming that, one day, husbands will assist easing
her burdens.And, never once is the male
portrayed as an independent parent doing for his own good.
...As a proud Marxist, She compares women as the
analogous proletariat in the struggle for class-struggle.She considers child-bearing to be an act of
oppression & socialization.As
you're probably aware, these terms are repeatedly emphasized by Women's Groups.
And despite being given liberties to
speak freely, this view never changes.
Amazingly, Mz Jaggar is a
distinguished professor, who's taught at University of Illinois, University of
California in Los Angeles, and Rutgers, where headed the Woman's Studies
SO, aside from her personal
faults, there's an overall vast conspiracy to accredit feminist scholars.
In fact, Jaggar has been elected president of the American Philosophical association.It's incredible how such a bizarre abstract
thinker could achieve this status.
Even the staunchest
Extremists obtain high-degree of acceptance in many different fields.
M'lissa Gilbert is an associate professor at TempleUniversity. Her primary teachings are "Feminist Geography"(Once again, they mix "Junk Poetry" with fancy descriptions. it's classified under the general Geographical department. Other courses include "Feminist & Critical Race Theory". (which would be considered part of Urban Studies). She regards her role as Political Activist advocating social
change. Teaching "Feminist Methodology"& "Social Construction of Gender".
(Mra Footnote 1: Her Theoretical teachings are very unimpressive (Mra Footnote 2: This should not be the purpose of academic scholarship. (Mra Footnote 3: Women always remain at the center of interest.
Therefore, there's nothing "Radical" about lobbying for
women. One of her tasks is to perform STUDIES, to which, her conclusions then become accepted by mainstream media. One such study was an attempt to prove,that "welfare reform"
violates the fundamental rights of women. Bear to mind, her teachings involve hundreds of full-time
students. And, her research also warrants their participation. If nothing else, it diminishes from quality education.
When she introduced her course on "Marxism, Feminism, Critical Race theory, & Postmodernism",
it should've landed her
a place on the unemployment line. Instead, she was given tenure & the opportunity to promote
personal agenda. Her position allows her to hire associates within the same
(this also explains why women's Studies have become
widespread. Basically Feminists are
actively hiring members within their groups).
...And they are rewarded for this discriminatory practice. (ver1.01)
Professor Bettina Aptheker: University of California.
Proud communist & Lesbian Activist. Professor of Woman's Studies. Begins teaching "Feminism" in 1980. Brings "awareness" to theories on sexuality. She proudly describes Lesbianism as the highest stage of
Feminism. (A comparison of Bolshevik Red Army "Highest stage of
Capitalism".) She considers herself to be a Revolutionary Marxist
Feminist.Meaning, she encourages students to convert their sexual
orientation.Her primary teaching is "Lesbian Herstory".
Also, author of several books (based solely upon personal
viewpoint).Such examples are "Woman's Legacy", "Intimate Politics", and "Voices of resistance".
Basically: she teaches her own principles. ...And, this is deemed acceptable for an academic scholar.
Professor Caroline Higgins of EarlhamCollege is a pro-communist and
And, for no apparent reason, she's also an Ecologist and
Inner circles throughout the academic community share a common ambition: [They teach students to become supporters
of Women's Groups]. And Professor Higgins is no exception to this rule. This task is accomplished by using an effective tool. Mainly, by fusing "Environmentalism" along with her
personal agenda. This is an extremely common practice amongst scholars.
(in an unrelated matter:There are two websites, entitled "Care2"& "Bee2"; which typically use 'environmental
issues' along with Feminized dogma.)
Professor Higgins official title is "Director" of "Peace and
Global Studies...". A wholesomely misleading ideal. And, even if correct, would still lack any merit for
educational purpose. More accurately, she teaches "Feminism, Ecology, &
Peace". Now, quite frankly, this unlikely combination is a total joke.
Also, even without the feminized aspect, It's still ludicrous to "work together for peace"in a credited educational setting.
And, on a similar note, Professor Higgins has few
professional merits. This proposes an issue beyond moral agenda. Discriminatory Employment becomes a key issue, here.
Aside from everything else: Why should she be appointed a top earning academic career ? Her teachings are based solely upon
dogmatic essays, which combine such unlikely duos, as,Feminism & Global
In fact, her exact words includes three basic types of
of earth, and ---colonial violence. Her material would be more at home, in the Circus. Such hypothetical rhetoric is not only ridiculous,But it's also based
purely upon theoretical opinions.
How exactly did Mz Higgins acquire her position, despite no
merits? The reason is because women & extremists are generally
given top priority in the hiring process
This is the issue which is mainly overlooked.
Many argue the case in favor of the 1st
Amendment. However, this shouldn't pertain to accredited
acceptance.It's simply not professional to include Activism in education.
Professor Regina Austin believes that the black community
should engage in criminal behavior against the white peoples.
In her exact words: "to find good middle
ground between straightness and the more extreme forms of lawbreaking".
Although Professor Austin is primarily a racial activist,
(specializing in "Critical race Theory"),
She is also a teacher of Feminism. ...And a leading authority economic discrimination and minority
"legal feminism". Ironically, she subdivides her students according to race,
gender, religion, and sexual orientation. She encourages students to analyze law according to their
perspective groups. Regina Austin is a Professor of Law at University-of-Pennsylvania. She promotes non-conformity in law, but only for those given
minority status. Believing there should be no distinction between lawful and
Amongst other things, she once encouraged Store
employees tosteal merchandise and [spread their contraband around the neighborhood]. ----The common attitude amongst the academic community is to
join theological forces.----
It's rare for varying Social-groups to dismiss one another. Instead, each non-related program is advanced to credited studies. They're given the liberty to pursue theoretical high-paying occupations. And, it's not unique to any specific group.
Aside from Women, there are many other Activists. Several idealists are given opportunity to earn an easy living.
The entire educational system has been affected by different forms of extremism.
Therefore, supporters cannot claim there's any justified purpose. Basically, every group is represented, with the exceptions of Men & Caucasians.. Although, feudal attempts have been made to begin "Men's Studies Courses", which would actually be controlled by Feminist groups. Amazingly, Women's Groups have openly admitted their desire to lead all Scholastic Studies for Men. This goal has been made public on such nationally syndicated programs as "To The Contrary".
Professor Miriam Cooke teaches Middle East Woman's studies,
at DukeUniversity.Primarily promoting
the liberation of women within her culture. (Which is NOT a valid academic curriculum). .....But also manages to include African literature in her
teachings. As well as, promoting anti-Jewish sentiment (Including: placing blame
upon Israel for
the 9/11 attacks on the WorldTradeCenter). Also, opposes what she calls the "New Imperialism" from the United
States.It's ironic how she specializes in Middle Eastern Women's Studies, Yet still considers others.
to be the oppressor.(??)
Professor Cooke also supports a Woman's Jihad, during a
lecture at WellesleyCollege. Interestingly, she claims to be the
victim of injustice, while also being given liberties which men are
categorically denied.More ironically,
she supports a jihad. But, not
necessarily in assumed context.For
example, When a Female Palestinian bomber killed an Israeli male, Professor
Cooke placed blame on "the imperialists". (meaning, the victims of terrorist
attacks have brought these troubles upon themselves.)
She also believes, The United States was at fault, during
their conflict with the Taliban.(?????) On a Professional level, white males are not given the opportunity to express their beliefs. Nor, can any man achieve a monetary occupation from this.
And, that's a recurring theme here. Why should these women reap success from their own feminist dogma? Perhaps, we should ask Billionaire talk-show host, Oprah Winfrey.
Kerry Dunn of ClaremontCollege. Activist, and
faculty member.Often speaking out
against racism, sexism, homophobia, and, environmental issues.
(Here we go, again.These four separate topics are melded into
one.And, even though universities
pander to those specific groups, they still feel a sense of outrage.Special Interest groups continue making
these claims.And, No matter how much privilege Feminists are given, they
will always show disapproval.)
Kerry Dunn experienced an event which seemed to justify her
cause. One day, she arrived at her vehicle, only to learn that a
vandal had painted various racial slurs.As well as, sexist & homophobic remarks.This sparked a rally which literally shut
down all classroom activities.However,
the investigators quickly learned that Dunns claims were a hoax.Surprisingly, the school administrators
still supported her, afterward.And,
they felt it had a "positive impact" protesting against these alleged evils.
So, although we
shouldn't hold the university responsible for her offense, they readily offered
excuses which ultimately supported her actions.
Professor Angela Davis was a member of the Black Panthers. And, she believes that All minority inmates should be freed.In fact, she became the leader of this
movement, claiming that all minorities
are political prisoners.And, this
"liberation" of inmates should only apply to the ethnic minorities.So, this has no similarity to the Progressive
Prisoners Movement which represented all inmates, regardless of class.
She once plotted to free her lover, George Jackson, who was
So, her ideals which demand freeing "Political Prisoners" goes beyond
reasonable understanding.She was acquitted by an enthusiastic jury, who helped
celebrate her victory.She gained
worldwide attention as a hero by survivors of Soviet work Camps. Interestingly, she shunned an appeal from Czech prisoners
who appealed (to her) for help.In her
exact words to the Czechoslovakians: "Let them remain in prison. That is the
face of Communism.And the Heart of
Communism for you".Although, she
herself was freed, after school children signed a petition for her release. And she also supported the Soviet Government,
despite their detainment of millions without trial. She twice ran for vice-president under the Communist Party
Ticket in 1980 and 1984.
the Stalinist/Lenin Award in 1979.
Not Surprisingly, she also teaches Feminism
Her efforts include, "Women, race, and Class
Racism"; "Violence against woman and the ongoing challenge to racism";
"Radicalism, Gender, and Race in U.S. Culture; and, Global Critical Race-Feminism".
----Notice the mixture of several non-related issues.Yet, despite everything, she is considered to be one of the
top 7 University Professors in the State of California.(And upon reviewing her qualifications, it leaves to speculate how it's possible to achieve this
There's an unnamed professor at BaylorUniversity who calls herself a "Christian feminist Theologian".
is another example of meaningless titles given to Activists who control the
Professor Bernadine Dohrnhas called for a war on behalf of the 3rd world, as well as,
all those currently in prison.She spells
Bernadine then became a professor of law at NorthwesternUniversity. Was also a member of a 1960's group, called The Weather
Underground. As well as, "the War
praised the Manson Murders, because the victims were upper-classed.Her group attempted to set-off a bomb at a social
dance.Instead, three members were
accidentally killed by the detonation.
She's also the lead
suspect in an unsolved murder. During the 1970's,
she was caught stealing credit card numbers from shoppers, while she was
employed at a Children's store. (not to be named). She has called for race-wars.
In the 1970's, Miss Dohrn was on the FBI's 10 most
wantedfor several years. All charges
were dropped, due to illegal search procedure.
Okay, you might say, "It's a free country".
But, she was hired amongst hundreds of other candidates for
Director of the Legal Clinics "Children & FamilyJusticeCenter".
(??????) She was also given honors as a commencement speaker at collegiate
graduations.And, she's been given
important position in the American Bar Association, as well as, the ACLU.
objective during her tenure at the "Children's JusticeCenter"is granting immunity to the most violent
juvenile offenders.SO, amongst other things, this woman's success should be
considered "discrimination" to all those who were more qualified for the
.....However, this is obviously the least of our troubles.
Danielle Gamache, teacher of English at Millbrook High School, in New York. Dating from 1972 until 1992. Ms Gamache spent nearly 20 years promoting a feminist platform. This includes investing Tax dollars into various fictional novels; written from The Feminist Perspective. Her activity persisted for several decades. But, it was permitted by the administrators; supposedly protected by the 1st Amendment. Meanwhile, Feminist literature is being dispersed amongst students. There are many consequences. Another female teacher reaps a living, by promoting her own agenda. While also granting easy wealth for feminist authors. Beyond this, Ms Gamache actively taught balance-of-power between the sexes. Yet, she remained oblivious to her own self-privilege.
So, you now realize, indoctrination is not limited to big Universities. Activism has reached its way into every level of schooling. This particular case is noteworthy because it did not involve Social studies or Women's History. Nor, the sciences. Rather instead, her curriculum revolved around poetry & short stories written by Feminist Authors. Yet, be assured; if Ms Gamache was still teaching today; she'd be focusing upon better issues. Perhaps, ... promoting Woman's History? Or, Sexual harassment would become a hot topic. ...or, some other idea *the dates 1972-1992 are approximate.
Anatole Anton; Professor of Philosophy at San Francisco
A teacher of "Radical Philosophy". He's Primarily against capitalism and Pro-socialism. But, typical to many programs, his curriculum includes a heavy dose of "Women's Studies",
as well as, "environmental issues". This alone discredits such individuals as manipulative social climbers.
---Created his own group called the "Radical Philosophy
---Opposes aid to Israel.
for 3rd world Poverty. In his exact words, "I believe that fundamental change
requires social upheavals, ...and oppositionto...capitalism, racism, sexism, homophobia, .and....environmental ruin..." (how did the term "sexism" get into the discussion?)
here's a sample of Anatole's classroom activity:
Toward a New Socialism Anatole Anton
- Thursday, September 6
- 7:30 PM
Join San Francisco State professor, Anatole Anton, for a discussion on
revolutionizing the U.S. political and social landscape. Toward a New Socialism
offers a critical analysis of capitalism's failings and the
imminent need for a new socialism as an alternative form of government.
NOTE: There's an Activist, named Jacob Laksin, who's criticized the information found in The professors. Citing that, most allegations were distorting the truth. Mr. Laksin also claims the above material is mixing examples which were used out-of-context. ---He attacks the literature for a few basic reasons.
1)The book cited references to professors who are members or various organizations. But, Mr. Laksin points out, that many of those groups are mere creations its members. So, Dave Horowitz is accused of giving false information. When his book mentions organizations such as "The American Institute of Philosophical scientists, etc, etc, etc, Mr. Horowitz fails to cite this information .
Our Response: We already know that most Activists create fictitious organizations. And, their efforts are often presented in a manner which gains official status, no matter how insignificant that group may be. Basically, Mr. Laksin has got alot of nerve pointing this out. Femi-Marxists fabricate their own fictitious organizations. And, he's trying to blame Dave Horowitz for falsely indentifying those grroups as mainstream studies. Perhaps, the blame should be placed upon those who create deceptive groups. -of course.
2)- Dave Horowitz supposedly presented misleading information. Many quotations made by professors & faculty were cited outside the classroom. And the Author failed to mention that fact.
Our Response- It doesn't matter where their remarks originate, whether inside or outside the classroom. The fact still remains: all described quotations were stated by the persons in question. Needless to say, this creates a profile of those in question. And, it shouldn't surprise anyone to learn that most quoted remarks were made outside the classroom. In fact, it would be difficult to maintain a log from within.
3)- Mr. Laksin states that there are flaws in The Professors. When its researchers investigated the backgrounds of various individuals, Latsin pointed out that, much of the information gathered doesn't actually pertain specifically to those people. Rather instead, they often belong to radical organizations. And, Horowitz gave detailed accounts describing actions within that sector. So, according to Latsin, The Professors falsely identifies this research as personal beliefs by distinct academics. But, in truth, these individuals were not personally responsible for many described cases.
Our Response- Mr. Laksin is missing the entire point. The purpose of the book is to prove there's a serious problem in Academics. So, it's not a specific attack on any individual. Rather instead, The Professors was set-out to expose wide-scale corruption. Also, since these individuals are members of Extremist-Groups, it's valid to investigate those organizations. After-all, if they belong to those groups, then, they obviously believe in their principles. Also, Mr. Laksin is practically admitting that actions within these groups are ethically wrong. So, in an effort to protect specific individuals, he practically places all guilt on those Marxo-feminist organizations.
SO, in conclusion: The overall probably is actually WORSE than described in the book. Dave Horowitz only exposed a select group of individuals. He didn't even begin to tackle its enormity. His book only focused on Professors, while leaving out mainstream academics. The fact is: Most Universities have been infiltrated by Marxists, Black Panthers, and Women's Groups. And, virtually every Text-Book has been tarnished by Feminism. Plus, our public schools, grades Kindergarten thru 12 have all been corrupted by feminist philosophy. ......But, Dave Horowitz was only given enough time to write one book. So, Mr. Laksin should take this all into account.
We, we conducted our own brief study, lasting only a few brief moments. After reviewing a search engine for only TWO MINUTES, we found a University study course with several mandatory books, relating to "Feminism & Socialism".
---------, "The Mode of Reproduction in Transition: A Marxist-Feminist
Analysis of the Effects of Reproductive Technologies," GENDER & SOCIETY
(September, 1991), 334-350
Martha E. Gimenez, "Structuralist Marxism on The Woman Question." Science & Society,
Vol. XLII, No. 3 (Fall-Winter): 301-323. (If we're not mistaken, that's volume 42).
Johanna Brenner, WOMEN AND THE POLITICS OF CLASS. Monthly Review Press, 2000.
Rosemary Hennessy, MATERIALIST FEMINISM AND THE POLITICS OF DISCOURSE.
___________. and Chrys Ingraham, eds., MATERIALIST FEMINISM. A Reader in Class,
Difference, and Women's Lives. Routledge, 1997.
Reimut Reiche, SEXUALITY AND CLASS STRUGGLE. Praeger Publishers, 1970.
Lise Vogel, MARXISM AND THE OPPRESSION OF WOMEN. Toward a Unitary Theory. Rutgers University Press, 1983.
Martha E. Gimenez, Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy.
Race, Gender & Class, Vol. 8, No. 2, 20001.
We also found that the author of Several books mentioned above also happens to be the Professor who's teaching the class. (Martha Gimenez)
Sociology 5061 MODERN MARXIST THEORY Spring 2007
Professor: Martha E. Gimenez
Office: Ketchum 205A
CELL PHONES AND PAGERS MUST BE TURNED OFF BEFORE ENTERING THE CLASSROOM
Okay,,,,,, It took TWO MINUTES to locate this information. And, be assured, Feminism has tarnished several million pages of our scholastic text.