MensRightsMovement.net now has a convenient URL link to this page: mensrights.cc
TOP NEWS STORIES
March 30, 2011.
MRM has been exploring the possibility of creating articles with Video, rather than print. But, this is really nothing new. During our first year in 1979 we were already experimenting with audio cassettes as a future means of presenting our information. We're quite aware that most people prefer the easy-access of listening (or watching), rather than reading. Unfortunately, no member of the group possessed advanced narrative skills. But, MRM continued attempting to perfect audio presentations until 1994. We literally compiled thousands of hours of audio track. But, it was unreleased due to poor quality.
But, anyone can do their share in contributing to the movement. Simply, use any material throughout this website for making your own Videos. Then, post it on a network, such as Youtube or Dailymotion. It's that simple. You will find an abundance of issues, once you delve into the seemingly infinite pages or this website. And, it's readily available, for the taken. You might even prefer to add an original touch to the articles posted here. Or, if you wish to recite the material verbatim, then choose this option instead.
SO, each and every reader can get involved.
march 30, 2011.
Within the past several weeks, MRM has released videos dealing with the issue of Zionist extremism. This caused an immediate backlash. Now, if you read through the thousands of material throughout this website, there are no references whatsoever toward the issue. However, this is mainly due to our reluctance to address this topic.
In all honesty, there's an extremist sect of Zionism more dangerous than radical Islam. They're responsible for many wrongs in current society. Ranging from Political Correctness, male bashing, radical feminism, and communism. We should also include Media propaganda, and the corrupt Educational system; which had introduced the entire concept of degrading Caucasians.
Essentially, MRM has been aware of this problem for quite some time. IN fact, these claims are quite easy to research. However, it's a taboo subject which might offend members of the Jewish faith.
(Yet, oddly enough, this rule never applies for the average American guy. It's considered perfectly okay to mistreat specific groups of men, particular those of European descent. Ironically, this goal was clearly spelled out by Social Marxists, in the 1920's. Communists at the Frankfurt School introduced the idea of Critical Theory. And these roots formulated the eventual practice of Journalists degrading White Men; in our daily newspapers.) And, it just so happens that The Critique was devised by extremist Zionists.
strange as it may sound.
Effective February 5, 2011: -♣ MRM will begin using articles shaded with different colors. We were reluctant, since it's too gimmicky. But, this enhances the ease of browsing.
d Feb.8, 2011 The Rise of Men's Rights Movement: 2012. Men's Rights looks forward to new beginnings.
In the year future; you will begin seeing profound changes in MRM. Our site will shift toward the more radical sector. One reason is because we have no reputation to protect. The Men's Rights Movement is not generally a popular topic. One of our good friends at Voy 217785 operates a sexually based forum. And, not surprisingly, his site is enormously popular. Now, let's talk about our relationship to other Men's Rights websites. Unfortunately, MRM has never been promoted by any other Men's group. In fact, the opposite is true. These sites will promptly remove comments written by another Men's website. They'll even block their Youtube videos from being seen elsewhere. MRM is by far the most extensive website relating to the subject of Men's Rights. However, in order to draw traffic to a website; it's necessary to discuss current events. But, these failures have all worked to our advantage. IT gives us the opportunity to stray from typical subject-matter. This website certainly idolizes other MRA's. We're huge fans of Glenn Sacks; A Voice for Men; Chapin's Inferno; and many others. However, MRM models itself after The National Center for Men. And, we're quite similar to Angry Harry. This website never captured the Macho audience who's attracted to Dick Masterson and MABTW. This brings us to the final point. You will see profound changes in MRM. This website will tackle such issues as The New World Order; and The growing hostilities from around the world.
YoungTurks promote bigotry;
despite their position against Racism.
Currently, every major News program ignites racial hatred and strife. So, they spread lies claiming that white people have racist attitudes. For example: Radio & Internet personalities, such as The Young Turks; are gaining popularity just by portraying "White People" as the bad guys. SO, they try to substantiate these claims by siting alleged biases & double standards. This produces a ripple effect which directs hatred against the targeted group. Thus defeating the whole purpose. Basically, The Young Turks are racial bigots. If you browse through their material; they always side against Europeans. But, at the same time; they remind their audience that 'white people are racist'.
(Section B) Here's a few quick examples: When Sarah Palin's teenage daughter became pregnant; The Young Turks transformed the event into a racial issue. How was this possible ? The reason is supposedly because Journalists would have stereotyped a black teenage mother. Now, even if those allegations were true; it's redundant to focus on racial issues so frequently.
But, it just so happens: Sarah Palin DID face ridicule from the Media because her teenage daughter had a baby.
(Section C) On another episode; they spoke about racial stereotypes in our daily language. The term "Soccer Mom" is supposedly biased in favor of White People. Meanwhile, a black woman is referred to as "Welfare Mother". This is another example of cheesy, dumb-ass Journalism. Once again, his claims are untrue. But it's quite irrelevant anyhow. The Young Turks; Cenk Uygur was comparing middle-classed women (aka Soccer Mom), with someone who's receiving public subsidies. But, as usual; The Turks are fixated on this narrow issue: "racism".
In other words: They're merely promoting this theme, in order to attract hordes of followers. The Young Turks are popular to a world-wide audience. Mainly because he portrays 'White Men" as the bad guy. The Turks accuse Glenn Beck of racism; merely because Mr. Beck opposes many policies of President Obama. Several other celebrities face similar accusations.
We browsed through one hundred video clips, from the Turks. And, they followed a basic formula:
Their program is similar to a 1980's Woman's Talk-Show. Back then, Woman's Groups had total authority over daytime television. And, as a result; there was an entire lineup of Gynocentric programing. It's too difficult to explain every detail; but The Feminists were given the power to create any subject-matter they pleased. And, this was carried out routinely. Surprisingly, these Women's Talk-Shows spent enormous time promoting gender neutrality. They often made such claims after being guilty of the exact same faults. Thus, a simple pattern began to emerge. She would first spend an entire segment focusing upon women. Afterward; reminding everyone that women are unfairly stereotyped. The next day, each Woman's Talk-Show would repeat this same sequence. In simple terms: They'd make a lot of sexist remarks. Only to claim that he's the Chauvinist pig. Basically; these programs created their own virtual universe. Even though everything revolved around women; they could still convince everyone that the opposite was true. Audiences were hypnotized into believing an overall storyline. And, it transcended any sense of reality. (Section E)--A Comparison Between Women's Talk-Shows and The Young Turks--.
Women's Talk-Shows could create any scenario, day after day. No one would question their narrative. And, nothing could ever be done about it. But unfortunately; these programs could justify their own presence. Each time women made unfair remarks; she could simply point the finger back at him. It's pretty simple: All discussions centered around her. Feminists could steer the program into any plausible direction. Everything favored women. Yet, men were portrayed at the antagonists, deserving of all blame. The same methods were applied to literature; scholastics; Journalism; and what-have-you. (Secttion F) --Using the Same old Techniques.--
Now, The Young Turks are somewhat similar. Their radio broadcast is nothing new. They display typical bias against the same targeted group. But, as always; they can steer things into any possible direction. Cenk Uygur often makes unfair remarks. But, he also has the ability to reverse these accusations. The entire media plays this simple game White men are negatively stereotyped; while also being faulted. If you've watched the Young Turks in action; you'd think they were the first ones to ever criticize men.. But, after 40 years of Feminist media, it's all the same rhetoric. The Young Turks are not breaking any new ground. It's the old formula that's been used effectively since the inception of Bolshevism. Two Words: Critical Theory. There are countless similarities between every program that bashes white males. But The Young Turks add new elements. Just remember that much of his audience has never even traveled to the USA. So, everyone gets their information from These amateurish Disk-Jockeys. Foreigners presume that white men are toothless, racist, fat, ugly ogres. But, it all makes perfect sense to the listeners. Mainly because The Turks often use reverse-psychology. They spread messages of peace & understanding toward others.
(Section G) Amongst other things, The Turks push for rapid immigration into The United States. Interestingly, his native country of Turkey is 99.3% Muslim or non-believer. While only a half of 1% Christian. The Turks also blame the USA for past evils. Once again, the History books should remind him of his own dark past. (Such as, the modern world's first Genocide; and being the first to Veil women). Cenk was born in Istanbul; a natural province of Greece dissolved into the Ottoman Empire.
(Section h) The Young Turks are typical sour Journalists. Whenever presenting an issue; they fail to give any intellectual input. Instead, Cenk resorts to making 4th grade humor. And, he tries to make the other side look bad, rather than being educated. For example: He'll show footage of Bill O'Reilly losing his temper. Or, a brief clip of Glenn Beck stuttering. The entire media has been reduced to this type of smear campaign. MRM wouldn't even waste our time with this matter. But, these guys have received numerous awards for excellence. How is this possible? Primarily because every medium is controlled by extremists. Cenk Uygur has even found his way to MSNBC.
Take a look at This garbage. He's got no journalism skills whatsoever. He can't narrate. Nor does he say anything skilled or educated. Instead, he merely tries to make the other side look bad. So, why did MSNBC hire this guy ?
(The Lesson Learned) The USCIS should be careful as to who's allowed to migrate into our culture. Because The Young Turks are an example of hatred brought to America.
Cenk Uygur is not a Journalist. This is a total joke. The Young Turks should remain on Talk Radio, along side Howard Stern.
The Most Important Issue Facing Generations of Misguided Citizens
January 23, 2011 What is 2nd Generation Communism?
There's been a recurring issue within MensRightsMovement, dating back to our inception in 1979. In short: The Media is responsible for most troubles caused in this country. It seems like a grossly paranoid statement. But, these publications have enormous power when deciding which news the public should see. Now consider that many Journalists are actively involved within Special-Interest Groups. This was especially apparent when staunch feminists began hosting their own nationally syndicated talk shows. In a general sense, The Media has been slowly indoctrinating us, although few are aware of it. Nowadays, their approach is less obvious. But, the current generation of young people never witnessed 1980's television. BACK THEN: Feminism began controlling the entire daytime television line-up. And, shortly thereafter, it was closely woven into respectable news programs. Also, most Soap Operas, Night-time Dramas, Sitcoms, and Documentaries included randomly feminized themes. (2) ------ By every literal sense of the word: Feminism was 100 times worse during the 1980's. There is no exaggeration whatsoever. We're already aware that Feminized books ruled Book Stores, and Campuses. But, quietly sneaked its way into every major publication. The previous decade had fared little better. Most of the lesser artistic programming and literature was tarnished by feminists during this time. Luckily, they hadn't infiltrated serious mediums. But, their goals were quite obvious. Unfortunately, today's young viewers only know whatever they're taught. And, since The Media tells them that everything is "Racist" and "Sexist"; the viewer is inclined to accept this foregone conclusion. In other words: They can literally brainwash you into believing anything. So, in the 1980's, this was done through harshness and cruelty. But, the current media no longer requires these tactics. They can control your thoughts without passing an insult, or raising a fist. But, the results are the same, nonetheless. In fact, they've learned that it's more effective this way. This has been called "2nd generation Communism". And, it works so well because they literally own your minds. (3) ------ Two decades earlier, MRM had coined the phrase "GRADUALISM" when describing these techniques. This is far more dangerous than the Bolshevik Revolution. In this case, The Media simply wants to breed their own following. Just watch Jon Stewart or Bill Maher. Their entire routine is based upon clever manipulation.
Most news programs still pander to feminist groups, on a weekly basis. Only this time, it's not the same smearing campaign we saw in the 1990's. In fact, they're careful not to insult men too deeply. More will be said, at a future date:
(4) ------ In short: 2nd Generation Communism is formerly known as Gradualism. (a Term created by Seth Shannon). But apparently, only a hundred people in the entire world even bothered to notice. NextGen Communism is actually More dangerous than full scale revolutions. By this time, they have a full grip over your viewpoint. And, the younger generation is too young to have experienced firsthand contact. Thus, you're only capable of believing whatever you've been taught. (in other words: NexGen Communism is more difficult to defeat. They've won your support, often by promising utopia. and, rewriting past events. ) (Example: Most 21st century teenagers are indoctrinated to believe that everything carries negative stereotyping against African Americans and Women. Yet, none of these people were alive during the 1970's; when the entire media was either Afrocentric or Femalecentric. Indeed, most Journalists felt obligated to see matters through their perspective. But, the Teenagers of today simply don't understand this. Nor do they recognize that Feminists were also making thousands of Genocidal remarks against men.)
Now, with that said: let's review the latest topic: ......
The Attempted Rise of Islam in Europe. Conspiracy Theories:
Was this aided by Mainstream Media? A monumental issue was directed to the attention of MRM, just a few days ago. "Social Engineers" are trying to force the entire continent of Europe to rapidly integrate. But, after reading the material and watching footage; it seemed like more of a deliberate attempt to dilute their cultures.
This raised a few questions: Most importantly-why wasn't this issue given priority in mainstream media? Answer: The reason is because our media establishment hates everything European. And, they've always been hostile toward Western Civilization in general.
ALSO: The media is too busy sharing insignificant stories surrounding Women. --"The ten best ways women can invest their money". --"How women can manage their free time". --"More and more women are relocating for their jobs". --"there's a greater need for female employees during the recession". --"The Top 100 websites friendly to women" --"Single Mothers owning small businesses"..
This is how mainstream media stalls on the truly important issues. By every literal sense of the word: "They're deliberately wasting our time". So, while Europe is facing huge immigration from Islamic Countries, the Corrupt media decides to conceal this fact. They'd rather share daily stories which promote some trivial message. (2) Now, with that said: ask yourself if there's some hidden animosity within mainstream media. Let's not be paranoid; but it almost seems as though The Media is overridden with hostile individuals. And, it seems obvious that they're trying to ruin society, as quickly as possible. But, the younger generation is too young to remember the millions of insults against men; ...thrashed around during the 1970's. There's a connection between Media hostilities during the 1970's, and their failing to revert the huge migrations of Muslims into Europe. Do you remember the previous message? Progressive Media is controlled by unfriendly troublemakers. And, this is exactly why The Media ignored such as huge issue. They could have easily reverted the problem during its early stage.
....But, you will learn, both parties are one and the same. You see, The American & European Media are operated by Journalists who support ideals such as "Social Engineering" and "Genetic reconstruction". (3) They're the exact same "Bunch" who thoroughly abused men during the 1970's and 1980's. Only to lie to the younger generation about it. In basic terms: journalists literally aim to mistreat men. They want to destroy Europe. And, they hate Western Civilization along with all its freedoms. This might sound ridiculous: but, whenever you visit an online newspaper; just do a little investigative work. Chances are; this journalist belongs to a long list of organizations and groups which push an ideology. This is no exaggeration. This explains why their articles are so emotionally driven. Literally half of all journalists are nothing more than advocates, Activists, Social Engineers, Nutjobs, freaks, and troublemakers. And ultimately, they all have their own personal motives. The same issue can be made with regards to the immigration issue. Mainstream Media deliberately ignored this story for an entire decade. After which, the matter could no longer be kept secret. (4) Then, mainstream media blindly supported all levels of immigration, without limit. It seems rather strange that Journalists would take positions on issues, rather than covering the news objectively. And, they felt that no cap whatsoever should be placed upon immigration. Why on earth would they derive such a conclusion? DO they really feel that no limits should be placed on immigration ? LET'S REMEMBER; this was the very same media who ignored the issue for the previous decade. So, their true intentions are being revealed. IT ALSO EXPLAINS WHY they refused to take action while European Governments were conspiring against their own people. Do you understand the implications? The News Media was deliberately trying to destroy Europe, by failing to act. They've done much the same thing in The United States.
Now that the "Cat's Out of the Bag"; many Journalist simply admit their plans ....since it's already too late to do anything about it. (5) Yup, they've gone down that road before. But, let's not forget the past 50 years. Mainstream Media has launched many wars against society. There are too many to list. But, their onslaught against men certainly comes to mind. Therefore, you cannot merely look at The Media's attempt to ruin Europe and USA, without going to its roots. In the 1970's onward through the 1990's, men were being emotionally raped and stripped of every ounce of dignity. And now, Mainstream media conspires to Ruin Europe as well? END
I was reluctant to criticize G.W. Bush, during his presidency.
please be patient while MRM is upgrading.
feb 5, 2011 Racial strife: an editorial response. updated on Feb 9./
MRM received an angry letter from an African-American Gentleman. He was offended by an article here which claimed that Mainstream Media throughout the past several decades was Afro-Centric.
But the content was taken completely out-of-context. Essentially, MRM was challenging the idea that various ethnic groups are negatively portrayed by The Media. SO, as a response: we merely stated that such claims were false. (Ironically, MRM is not opposed to racial advantages for the African American community). But, let's not evade the issue. Currently, the entire Media repeatedly says that Caucasians are guilty of racism, sexism, and every other guilt. Yet the very same Journalists who also claim bias from within. And, that's where MRM totally disagrees. Our Newspapers can't possibly have things both ways. It's perfectly fine to show understanding toward the African-American community. But, with that said; Reporters simply have no reason to state otherwise.
IN simple terms: MRM does not take opposition to Special Interest. But, once this is done; Journalists can no longer claim that the media is biased against African Americans. That's simple logic.
In review of previous events, from 2010;
Harry Reid of Nevada was able to win his bid for a 5th term. This was the case despite his past attempts to give blanket amnesties.(not to be confused with 'The Dream Act'. Reid had initially sponsored the main amnesty four years earlier). But after reviewing the election, its outcome was likely determined by mainstream media. Opponent, Sharron Angle was often described as an extremist, merely because she was a member of the Tea Party. One voter described it best: families were reluctant to vote for weird maniacs. And, since the News Industry made such accusations; thus, Harry Reid was able to win re-election.
Republican Politics are often Correct; but not Well-Presented.
(worth mentioning) Senator John McCain from Arizona finally changed his position on amnesties; recently opposing the Dream Act. He initially supported all forms of legislation. Essentially, the problem has finally been properly addressed. However;
Senator McCain's Daughter Gives Caution to Republicans Daughter Meghan McCain gave valuable advice during a recent interview. She warned that Republicans had better change their approach. Simple message, but it's certainly a huge political issue.
This information is not the least bit surprising. Indeed, Republicans are not well-represented. And, so many faithful conservatives admit that they could see why others are turned -off by Conservatism.
The Democratic party is often better orchestrated. For example, The 2008 Democratic Convention contained a lavish stage suitable for a futuristic theme park.
Meanwhile, faithful listeners of Hannity & Limbaugh usually agree with their position. Yet, tend to disagree with their rude approach. SO, in the end, Politics are no different than any other job. All that really matters is how you present yourself.
(The issues matter very little. It's more important to portray a positive image.)
And, that's the face of American Politics. So, future Republicans must take this into consideration. The 2008 primaries were determined by Barack Obama's ability to electrify his audiences. Yet, few people knew his positions on the issues.
IN PLAIN ENGLISH: Conservatives do not present themselves well. Many are rude, obnoxious bullies. And this inevitably turns public opinion against them. But, it's important to sway toward their political agenda. Republican policies promote economic grown. But, this becomes difficult because Conservatives sometimes act like total Boneheads.
The Democrats have a completely different approach. Their presentation gets an A+. It's a well-packaged theme. Even though Leftist policies never work, in the real world. So, it's a dangerous game of Style vs. Substance. The following video explains the issue of Iconography:
Conference Aimed to Boost Esteem in 7th-Grade Girls
This week, the Live Your Dream Girls Conference was held at Dutchess College. The Event was sponsored by The Association of University Women.
The Workshop intends to raise her level of creativity, self-esteem, and leadership skills. The 7th graders met with College Students & Professional Women. Coordinator, Marcine Hum-Phrey claimed there's a decline in morale during this period in a girls life. This is supposedly due to the negative impact of society, media, and peers.
This gathering was designed to help girls in day-to-day activities, as well as long-term goals.
Perhaps, more notably, was the article featured in the local newspaper, prior to the event. It marked the 5th consecutive year, this story reached the headlines. It's likely, the same News Story will appear in November of next year.
Similarities should be noted, each time a Newspaper article focuses upon women & girls. One such example was the Workshop Promoting Science for Girls. In 1996, a front-page headline appeared in the local Dutchess newspaper. And, each year thereafter, an identical story would appear during each annual event. Some 12 years later, The same story promoting Science for Girls continued reading word-for-word. Nearly verbatim. Thus claiming necessity to help our girls develop their esteem. And, this knowledge will help them make Career Choices. (While also claiming there's currently a huge bias against girls. This type of material is commonplace.
....And, it serves as a clear indication of the redundant nature beneath the Cover-stories. Bottom Line: Workshops for Girls will inevitably appear on a routine basis.
MRM received an urgent notice from a concerned individual. It pertained to a crime that's taking place all across Europe. Their governments are inhibiting the spread of foreign influences.
Effective: January 23, 2011- a new link has been posted. Discussing Human-Rights Issues in Europe.
This link will remain permanent, unless you request otherwise. MRM sites should remain strictly faithful to Our Topic. However, The Media has covered-up this subject for the past 2 decades. So,urgency outweighs all other factors.
Group lobbies for anti-catcall legislation
On November 2, 2010; Yahoo's top headline featured an interesting story about street harassment which apparently plagues New York's busy sidewalks. It was also suggested that each female encounters 2 such incidents, per day. It's not surprising that such claims would include statistical corroboration. This happens to be the signature trademark of feminist literature. And, in this case, it seems rather impossible to suggest any fact behind the numbers. Yet, general stories are always accompanied by percentages & fabricated statistics.
The Article also claimed that many women who receive cat calls are "fearful for their lives". And, this allegedly rampart problem has affected our school-children more than any other age group. Statistically, teenage girls are the most likely to face street harassment. (It stands to prove how the media can build upon a simple idea; until it develops into a full-fledged news article).
It's also quite interesting how this type of outlandish material would earn the top spot on Yahoo's front-page news. But, if you've studies previous efforts, from the nations most visited homepage. In simple terms: several ridiculous articles appear on this, as well as, other trusted News pages. So, it's really nothing unusual.
Now, it's interesting to learn that the article originated some 4 days earlier, in the life & leisure section of a pop magazine, called Salon. It's author, Tracy Clark Flory considers herself to be writer who primarily covers feminism, pop culture, politics, and sex. In other words, these articles are written by persons which a biased perspective. Any you can certainly expect to see many articles relating to the topic of feminism. By no means should this be considered valid journalism. And, Yahoo News should not rely upon such sources.
This brings us to yet another important issue. Where exactly does this information derive. It just so happens, there's an advocacy group called Hollaback, who campaigns to bring awareness toward this matter. So, who exactly is Hollaback, and, why should their word be trusted? If you study into EVERY previous woman's issue, each was consistently promoted by mainstream media. This goes without exception.
As with most cover-stories, the Media tries to substantiate their claims by directing their attention toward a "Woman's Group" who specializes in that particular field. IN OTHER WORDS: Our most trusted Journalists rely upon hard-line feminists for their information.
The co-founders of Hollaback, Emily May & Oraia Reid; are both general-purpose feminist. (dedicated on behalf of gays, lesbians, and women's rights). Ms May has received the 2008 Stonewall Woman's Award, and was selected as one of thirty 'women making history' by the Women's Media Center. This obviously suggests a much broader effort geared toward helping women. Groups (such as the Women's Media Center) certainly have an extremely bias objective. And, it certainly has little to do with any specific.
And, in addition to this group, they've done precisely what countless feminists have during previous campaigns: These women have launched several organizations, rather than merely sticking with one. Others include: Right Rides for Women's Safety, New Yorkers for Safe Transit. This is comparable previous Women's Groups, who strive to create multiple namesakes.
MRM had the opportunity to visit New York City on several occasions. We walked through each & every street, surmounting roughly 200 hours. There was no evidence for Street Harassment whatsoever. However, panhandling, venders, & solicitation-of-literature were apparent problems.
It's important to remember,that, each time Feminists launch campaigns, their efforts are quickly accepted by mainstream media. The group, Hollaback, has already appeared on all major television programs, including Good Morning America, MSNBC, The Today Show, Fox, NPR News, & CNN Paula Zahn Show. This merely indicates that, the most powerful News programs are too anxious to promote Women's Groups. (You needn't be informed of their unfortunate recurring presence. Surely, you've all witnessed this before, from each of those listed news programs.
In addition to the television programs listed above, also take a look at major Newspaper & internet coverage spanning little over a week:
November 8, 2010 New York Times "Phone Apps Aim to Fight Harassment".
November 6, 2010 MSNBC "Should Street harassment be Made against the law?"
November 1,2010 Jezebel (celebrety, sex, fashion for women)
"Can a City effectively Ban Catcalls?"
October 29, 2010 Gothamist "Street Harassment Finally Gets City's Attention".
October 28, 2010 New York Post "Lawmakers Probe street harassment of NYC Women".
October 28, 2010 Washington Post "Lawmakers Probe Street Harassment of NYC Women".
October 28, 2010 Metro "City Talks Back to harassers"
We're obviously dealing with a corrupt media with its priorities in the wrong place. More importantly, this is ruthless treatment against our sons;who are endlessly forced to encounter these types of humiliating articles.
Aside from News Coverage & Advocacy, there's a more disturbing consequence to this story. Ultimately, the Woman's Groups are pushing for legislation. (ahh, did you really think it would stop here?) It's not necessarily wrong to complain if you've suffered a negative past experience. However, this organization seeks to involve Government Officials. They held a meeting with a New York Council Committee.
Their case was heard by Julissa Ferreras, Chair of the Woman's Issues Committee.
Hollaback has already successfully lobbied the MTA to distribute & post anti-harassment billboards. And, they are currently attempting to mandate no harassment zone signs.
(This is not the first time Women's Groups have pressured for invasive government mandates. And, it won't be the last, either).
Lobbyist Groups have not Subsided, Decades Later
RE: "Street Harassment" The above article analyzed in general terms. Women's Groups constantly push for legislation which matches their agenda. And, this is fully accepted by the mainstream journalism.
MRM began taking notice, three decades earlier. In 1981, we were studying into the presence of feminism in media. And, a recurring trend was quickly recognized. Various Articles would appear in Women's Magazines during each publication. And, within a few weeks afterward, those exact same issues would begin appearing on prominent Morning News programs. This suggests that a large number of female reporters had been reading through these magazines. Thus inspiring subject-matter derived from those sources. In simple terms: The main Networks had begun allowing Women's Magazines to influence their material.
This story should be remembered each time a newly organized discussion centers upon a Feminist theme. This has been repeated on a weekly basis, for decades. So, please bear this to mind.
October 30, 2010
The Daily Show's Jon Stewartlaunches Rally To Restore Sanity.
Today, a Rally To Restore Sanity was held at the National Mall, in Washington D.C. It's creator, Jon Stewart, was concerned by the rising numbers of political dissidents. Mr. Stewart considers such outbreaks counterproductive to society as a whole. Thus, the rally on October 30th is designed to challenge recent protests.
However, Mr. Stewart is not aware that organizations, such as Mens Rights Movement, had already predicted this changing attitude 30 years earlier. During the turmoilous 1960's, many Americans Justified similar attacks on a wider scale. During that period, any perceived injustice warranted organized protests. Yet, now, those same individuals have come to fear outbreaks from opposing forces.
An early sign of counter protests can be traced to demonstrations held against Reverend Jesse Jackson, back in 1990, when students demanded an end to quotas & privileges. And, not surprisingly, Rev. Jackson considered these actions disruptive. But, these same individuals support their own firsthand experiences, when holding rallies becomes routine activity.
Ultimately, The Rally to Restore Sanity, conveyed an unexpected message. Now, people are finally beginning to realize that mass protests are a form of violence & bullying. They should not be considered peaceful demonstrations.
There's little doubt:
whenever Activists organize rallies against men in past decades, their goal was to send fear into the silent observer. And, this fact can only be understood, when Men's Groups begin promoting mass demonstrations.
October 20, 2010
NFL still Probing into allegations of Sexual Harassment
The Association of Women in Sports Media has demanded a full investigation, after female reporter Ines Sainz was allegedly harassed by members of the New York Jets, during practice. The AWSM has also pushed for a mandated training program. These classroom studies would teach all NFL players how to conduct appropriate behavior.
This is merely the latest example of various Women's Groups establishing influence over personal activity. Thus constituting a much larger pattern of Feminist political authority. In years past, little was done when Women's Groups implemented their rules throughout Media, Academics, and Private Industry.
It should first be noted that reporter Ines Sainz never accused anyone of harassment. Rather instead, another Journalist instigated the entire story, merely because Quarterback Mark Sanchez threw footballs in her direction. Thus sparking an entire Media Frenzy, once again lifting Feminism into the spotlight. This should raise serious concerns regarding how Mainstream Journalists give priority to Feminist Related topics.
So, it all proposes a simple question: Is this the type of media we can trust? Certainly not. They clearly have an extremist agenda giving precedence to Women's Groups. It also stands to prove that The News Industry steers toward false priorities. After all, it would be difficult to measure the number of Journalists who've covered this trivial event which took place during Jets Training. But, it's to be expected from a corrupt media which has already promoted Feminist dogma consistently, for decades. So, is this latest article really different from the others ?
Also notice how NFL Commissioner, Roger Goodel, was obligated to fully investigate this matter. Obviously, he must comply, or face harsh criticism from mainstream media. This entire story proves how quickly News Journalists collectively join together to push their agenda. And, in every case, their personal goals override general consensus.
So, in the end, this is not a story about Ines Sainz being harassed by NFL players. Rather instead, it's the byproduct of mainstream activism. And, even modest sources suggest that 80% of all journalists have extremist viewpoints. This is why such trivial stories gained massive worldwide attention.
Since getting involved, The Association of Women in Sports Media has vowed to push for a Workplace Conduct Program involving all players from 32 teams. This prompts a simple question: what type of viewpoint did you expect from AWSM ? They are a Women's Organization. And historically, they take an immediate hard-line position on every issue. Yet, despite their narrow-minded viewpoint, Women's Groups always receive full cooperation from Media Circles.
Hopefully, this article brings awareness to a much broader issue. Essentially, the Media has a stranglehold over our society. And they react to matters according to a predictable pattern of bias. And, it's amazing how these events carried a guilty verdict, before anything was known. And that's precisely how overzealous journalists conduct their subprofessional activity.
Brief commentary by MRM regarding the above article:
Upon reading various newspaper articles regarding this subject, we're taught to accept things purely at face value. But, the public must learn to challenge these notions.
For example: who is the Association of Women in Sports Media ?
Are they a non-bias organization, or, would they be more likely to focus upon women?
And, why were they contacted by the NFL regarding such matters?
Is this trouble in the making ?
AND, what exactly constitutes penalties for behavior which others find "offensive" ?
Why did The Media devote such lengthy time toward the incident concerning Ines Sainz?
and, why did it develop into a political issue?
Should there be an investigation launched into such trivial matter?
AND, did you notice how quickly Media Coverage became saturated with gender politics ?
Regardless of the story, things always have a way of 'getting out-of-hand'.
Also, Was this the 1st time a mandated behavioral class was implemented? Or is this merely part of a much larger problem? If people fail to take action against feminist policies, these groups will continuously extend their powers.
This article did not merely dominate the cover-pages of Sports programs. But instead, it also became a top story in Entertainment weekly, Social blogging, News & Business, and Teen Magazines, as well.
Perhaps, it's the Journalists themselves who should be "investigated" for improper conduct.
Happy New Year 2011.
MensRightsMovement has returned for another upcoming year. Although, the previous year produced relatively little action.
MRM was formed in 1979, by three founding members. Others have since joined the cause, and two originators from 1979 remain active until this very day.
The staff has worked tirelessly for several decades. However, 2010 was the first year which saw limited involvement. This was due to many factors, whether financial or lack of moral support. However, a new year looks ahead.
Amongst other factors, 10 years ago, MRM projected where the internet was eventually headed toward. Back then, there was an abundance of popular websites. Yet, we foresaw the day when just a few would gain all traffic. This prediction obviously turned out to be true. Nowadays, most people visit mega-sites such as Youtube and social networking sites (Facebook, Myspace). Naturally, little time remains for each site which specifically pertains to Activism. Audiences prefer being entertained by Videos. And, the average span of attention leaves little time for educational reading. Sadly, audiences prefer downloading movies and porn, rather than staying informed.