Governments are expendable / ··cultures are irreplaceable.
This page is still under construction.
Most people accept the idea that women are morally superior. And, men are responsible for all wrong-doing. Women's Magazines have stressed this point countless times. And, while trying to prove this point, they constantly make the argument claiming that "women are more peaceful". But, in truth, women have always admired warriors. The following video shows just one example: a military-man terrorized civilians for nearly 3 decades. and he continued waging war against an unarmed population. Then, when he was extradited to his former country, he was met with thousands of adoring fans. After-which, he promptly received 100+ marriage proposals. All this , despite this man having murdered several dozen innocent people in a barbaric manner.
You've all heard the argument claiming that males are violent. But, apparently, this is not considered to be offensive or degradating.
But, now, here's an interesting twist: whenever females display this type of behavior, they reach a different conclusion. And, suddenly, she's given total support ...(from those same people who supposedly condemn violence.)
The following video gives a perfect example of this grotesque double-standard. Here's a woman who's an absolute dictator. And, she's murdered rivals by methods of decapitation. But, she's even killed boys as young as 14. Now, with that aside, please remember: The American Media is hailing this dictator as a hero. It demonstrates just how outlandish the mainstream-journalism can be. More so, it completely invalidates the entire news industry, when reporting matters from this perspective.
Women claim that men are responsible for all evils & destruction. But, there's alot more to this issue than meets the eye.
Firstly, let's get into the issue of sexist stereotyping. It seems, women are allowed to make negative remarks against men.
2nd: males were generally forced to fight in wars. It has nothing to do with his personality.
3rd: oddly, women have since retracted their original claims. and, now, they support the militarization of women. This, of course, comes along with a frenzy of special attention (...which proceeds every woman's issue.)
4th: During the first Iraq war, Women's Groups actually claimed that men were reluctant to join the cause, while women voluntarily defended their country. SO, a man will only join if he's forcably drafted, while women are eager to join the cause. These types of comments are mere generalizations and, such unprofessional dogma should not be tolerated within mainstream media.
5th: regarding the notion that males are violent. Pioneering Men's Groups have always taken a distinct position regarding an age-old issue. They insist that women share equal responsibility for these wrong-doings. She's always preferred a soldier, and sought victory in warfare.
The following video demonstrates a perfect example. ---- The mother of a suicide bomber clearly encouraged him to commit these acts. She gave her blessings before he went and killed innocent civilians, including children. MORE IMPORTANTLY: after the attacks, the woman was interviewed and she reasserted her support for his actions. Despite the fact that, he too perished.
So, throughout history, women bear equal responsibility for all the world's troubles.
Sorry, but, another 'open project' has been started. It makes our job alot easier when the page is made public. SO, that's why mensrightsmovement.net has recently begun to release pages at their earliest stages. Thank you for your patience.
The following video you're about to watch is purely fictitious. Additionally, it is not a news-worthy article. They lead you to believe that a distinct event had taken place, warranting these "Defense classes" for women. But, in truth, it's nothing more than providing entertainment geared toward female viewers. And, ultimately, it merely reflects the personal beliefs of the journalist. Basically, she wanted to create a segment on any 'woman's issue'. Then, after deciding upon it, she's able to create an illusion that a 'current event' has just taken place.
Now, in the following video, you're lead to believe that a higher level of violence triggered this news segment. But, in truth, an individual journalist created this story. And, she's actively involved with 'Women's groups'. Also, the IBN news neglects to inform us: the Hindu woman leading the class is also an "Activist". That's correct: she's a long-time member of her countries movement. (Dealing with every possible issue, ranging from 'women in media' to 'women's health'.
Thus rendering the entire segment incorrect. SO, it's a mere show of theatrics. and, similar articles have appeared, from time to time.
On a similar note: there was a PBS documentary discussing the origins of The English Language. But, within the first few minutes of the film, there was an interview conducted with feminists. And, the opening segment featured a self-defense class sponsored by N.O.W.
It stands to prove how silly Journalism has become. But, when IBN created the above article, they pretend that nobody's never addressed these issues before.
NOW, for anyone who still believes the pablum regarding "Gender Equality", perhaps this video will finally put those claims to rest. We're looking at a true portrait of female arrogance. They clearly enjoy taunting men. And, making him look downright foolish. Plus, men are presumed to be attracted to women, while she proudly professes utter disinterest. There's an old stereotype. Women automatically believe that every man wants her. And, she doesn't share those feelings. (In which case, she publicly announces this).
So, this is precisely what many women truly believe. Pioneering Men's Rights Activists, attempted to criminalize this behavior. They argued that such behavior is considered a crime when con-artists defraud individuals. Thus, it should be considered no different when ladies meet gentlemen at bars. On a similar note: it's no wonder why some men develop hostile behavior toward women.