Governments are expendable / ··cultures are irreplaceable.
Q-II Echo Centauri
"Throughout The Cosmos"
Many people blame men for the worldwide military crisis.
It's so claimed, "we're on the brink of disaster", and, "it's solely the fault of men".
this is a complete myth.
Back in 1980, Carl Sagan devised the most Anti-Feminazi statement in world history. (Without even realizing his contribution to the Men's Movement.)
He said, something to the affect, "Any Advanced technological civilization, wherever they may be, stands a high risk of self-destruction". In other words: technological progress always hinders the potential for disaster. It's completely unrelated to one's beliefs, or civilized nature. Instead, there's just a natural possibility for wrongdoing. It doesn't matter WHO harnesses the power, or, where they reside in the Cosmos.
We could compared warfare in the 18th century, with the battles from medieval times. Clearly, the 18th century saw greater destruction, despite a higher level of barbarism during previous centuries. Once again, the higher technology produced wider destruction. It had nothing to do with ones culture, or gender.
2) Social barbarism is often caused by religious superstition. And, clearly, women are every bit as gloom, if not more so. SO, she's prone to same level of consequential ignorance.
3) If the U.S. failed to invent nuclear weapons, this actually would have increase the chances of destruction. This is an unfortunate byproduct of diverse nations. Each is required to develop a military, for purposes of protecting itself. There's little choice in that decision. Once again, this fact has little to do with cultural violence.
4) Aside from all else, most people bear little decisions in political affairs. So, these factors will inevitably affect our lives... whether we like it, or not.
And, this same rule applies Throughout the Cosmos.
Mens rights movement: Social Justice
A Titanic Issue ------------------
There's one Long-held topic which receives little notoriety. We're all aware that the female life has always been highly treasured. Indeed, a man has always been expected to possibly give his life, in order to save hers. And, more so, he's happily willing to take any risk, in doing so. However, there's more to the issue than our common belief. It goes further than anyone could've ever imagined.
This was a binding expectation, often mandated by legal recourse. The best example was the Sinking of the Titanic. Not only were men expected to perish, this was actually forced upon him. The men were excluded from rescue ships. and this rule was enforced literally at the barrel of a gun.
Even more interestingly, women were rescued despite their age or credentials. And, there were actual cases where an elderly woman was rescued, rather than an able-bodied male. One could argue, that she served no use whatsoever to society. Yet, her life was more valued, anyway. The previous sentence represents an entirely different issue. More importantly, it was a requirement.
This truly represents a big chapter in our forgotten history.
Whenever a woman speaks about relationships, she will often recite a theme about "Today's assertive woman".
Emphasizing a narrow outlook which distinctly applies to her gender.
uplifting phrases of the following nature: "Women nowadays aren't afraid to get what-she-wants". And "she's willing to take charge, in following her dreams" etc. etc. etc.
Now, many people might wonder why men would feel bothered by these mild remarks.
Firstly: this encouragement pertains specifically to her. So, it doesn't matter whether it's minuscule or insignificant. Nonetheless, it's directed specifically toward her. However, this doesn't prove to be a large factor.
Mainly: this dogma serves to Justify the inclusion of Extremist Groups throughout our daily lives.
Basically, you're suggesting that Feminists participated in creating helpful stereotypes.
So, it really becomes an insult to men. You might call it, a giant "Slap-in-the-face". So, whenever someone says: "Women nowadays are beginning to take a stand" or: "the modern woman is proud of her identity" .....etc. etc. Please remember: Anytime a woman uses such powerful words, ....she's actually condoning the severity of Women's Groups.
We should look at Feminized dogma in a completely different light: Plain and simple: They are a belligerent hate group. Imposing harshness & cruelty, which is perpetrated on a large scale.
basically, there's no reason to Justify the presence of Women's Groups.
And, that's the whole point.
So, with sincere advice: It's okay to speak positively of women, so long as it's not associated with Feminism.
So, you can build her esteem, by using uplifting words.... .....so long as it's not considered to be "modern", or, anything of the like.
For your information: society didn't begin complimenting women in the 1970's. Nor, was this uplifting spirit a direct result of "Feminized Groups".
So, it's okay to maintain those positive words, respectfully & sincerely for her. ......without claiming that Women's Groups founded this milestone.
for; it is they who strictly repress all forms of individuality. and, it is they who deny free-expression to others.
while, past generations had shown deepest concerns, which mirrors current attitudes.
These good words existed long before recent times. Keep it, cherish it, and share this adulation. It's perfectly okay. But, please, don't give credit to Extremist Groups. Just leave them out.
distorting your Inner Conscience. --------------------------------
In 1987, (independently of one another) both myself and Mel Feit attempted to define a short meaning. In his exact words, He said, "It's not a concept, it's a business".
While, at this exact moment, I described it more intensely: "It's not a concept, it's a religion"
both statements were correct.
Years later, the definition could become more chilling. So, ask once again: What is Feminism? Feminism is a state of mind. They literally try to consume you, with their propaganda.
The repetitive nature has a hypnotizing affect on the listener
Hopefully, this will give some indication regarding its severity.
by definition, Feminism truly is a game of psychological warfare.
Free Sailing --------------
DID YOU KNOW: most websites are able to record your personal information, and locale?
More so, they can determine how often you visit their website. Professional charts estimate the amount of time spent on specific pages. And, whether you browse they site, on a frequent basis.
BUT, "MENSRIGHTSMOVEMENT.net" chooses a better internet experience.
Whether you visit this site once, or, on a daily basis.
.........your habits are not being studied.
Strip Club ------------ Example of gender inequality # 1,331,468) -------------- Whenever ladies visit Male strippers, she gets to enjoy a "hands on" experience. While, in contrast, there's a completely different given rule regarding female strippers. Men are not allowed to touch any part of her body. Also, despite these severe restrictions, the media unjustly directs attention toward awareness campaigns. It's often claimed that men freely violate the female body. Therefore, he must be taught to change his attitude. This is actually designed to alienate the genders from one another. So, the pretext for their campaign is completely false.
Even more oddly, Male strippers are often targeted by usual sexist stereotyping. He's often accused of "sexually harassing" the women who attend these shows.
This could even be classifies as "assault". Simply because any new guest is reluctant to participate in the event. This happens to be a natural occurrence, amongst everyone. Male or Female.. When someone first begins attending a live strip-show, they initially maintain a distance from the dancers. In which case, the dancers then try to break-the-ice by encouraging them to participate. But, since the lady didn't want him dancing at her table, this somehow constitutes assault. Needless to say, the reverse rule doesn't apply. Female strippers constantly focus their attention upon the most unwilling guys. It's not really such a big deal. Her job is to liven up the situation. and, this includes helping the audience overcome their fears. But, when a male stripper starts dancing toward a disinterested party, he's risking legal repercussions.
(examples of social inequality) #' 1,331,469 (as well as, 1,331,470 &, 1,333,471) ---------- Swingtime ----------
The Swinger Clubs are similar to the Strip Scene. Many of the Swinging Groups don't allow Single males to attend.
More importantly, this rule is set-forth in a blunt manner. For example: they'll write an invitation Clearly stated that, any single man shouldn't even bother attending. In one instance, they tauntingly said, that he should try getting a girlfriend.
(regrettably, many rules are conceived by male members of the swingers club) (thus proving, once again, men are the oppressors of each other, AND women tend to prefer this type of Jerk.)
Also, during these "Parties", the woman is given liberty to grab & "Manhandle" anyone. Whereas, the male is required to ask permission, even if he's merely watching her from a distance.
(example of stupidity: #8,466) Interestingly, when the Swingers engage in activity, the woman feels extreme pleasure, whilst the male can barely maintain his erection. SO, there's really no reason for her to be considered the primary figure. nor, should the woman be highly sought, by comparison.
The Casual Attitudes toward Male Nudity ------------------------------------------------
Back in the 1960's, there were casual attitudes toward male nudity. So, young girls were given liberal opportunities to view the male anatomy. Whether, sons were told to change their clothing while sisters were present. or, young boys would run around the house naked. Whatever the case, MALES WERE STRICTLY FORBIDDEN FROM SEEING THE FEMALE ANATOMY.
this sacred attitude existed, despite the enormously lax mentality regarding his privacy.
There were many cases when a young man still hadn't viewed the female privates.
In 1963, a young guy decided to visit a nudist camp, because he had never seen a vagina.
Then, he was shocked to learn that Nudist Colonies don't allow single males to attend.
So, while every young girl was given the opportunity to overcome her curiosities, Even a male, ten years older was still forbidden from ever seeing the female anatomy.
That's truly disgusting.
This is a forgotten chapter of our history.
Modesty Warfare games ----------------------------
If you wish to learn about social inequality during the 1950's, here's a major example.
Back then, many girls strived to observe the male genitalia, without having to show theirs. After which, she would taunt him. There was the obvious reason, that, he couldn't see her body. but, it goes beyond that simple fact. Additionally, he didn't stand any chance to see any girl's anatomy.
Plus, she would REMIND him of this fact. For example, the girl would say, "I wouldn 't be stupid enough to show mine". Most important, she would tease him because he never gets to observe the opposite sex.
Now, this might all sound silly, but in order to recognize the destruction, you had to experience it first hand. At a time when boys were given no privacy whatsoever, he was never given the opportunity to see the female anatomy.
Now, honestly speaking, this was comparable to being in a war. Subsequentenly, boys learn that it's better to become uninhibited. rather than deal with the torment of "Modesty Warfare Games."
A Lifestyle without obligation. ----------------------------------------------------------
Whenever people talk about the past, they always describe work as the primary issue.
It's difficult to rationalize with today's generation. Because, they're taught to laugh at the very idea of previous lifestyles. But, the question is why? What makes you think it was such a "privilege" to work every day?
It stands to prove how easily people are manipulated by the media. The mere thought that a woman would actually "cook" a meal, causes either outrage or laughter.
This often came at a time when men worked 12 hour days, including saturdays.
By comparison, it was common for a woman to skip cooking, if so desired. In fact, some boys would mention how their moms only cooked a few times each week.
So, it really depended upon the woman's discretion. She needn't feel pressured to perform any chores.
This is not to suggest, she didn't work hard. But, there was no obligation what-so-ever.
There were cases when she never vacuumed. It all depends upon her personal decision.
Ironically, it was also common for men to assist her, despite working a long, hard day.
Some men would spoil their partners, by contributing beyond his expectations. This was very normal.
But, needless to say, there was one husband who was overly demanding. And, he becomes the benchmark of generalization.
Theoretical Education In most universities, there's a large portion of education which is based solely upon ones opinions. And, it's possible to earn a degree without a conventional recourse. It's truly a gray area. Yet, people become involved in their own causes, then incorporate it as part of their overall curriculum.
More and more, she's able to gain standard qualifications which carry the same validity as other fields.
This not only applies to Feminized classes, but, other well-established areas, as well.
For example: each time there's a debate regarding gender relations, your advesary then announces, that she holds a bachelors degree in Psychology.
Therefore, she become the authority on any perspective discussion. But in truth, her degree isn't worth the paper it's written on. Most Universities are infested by Activists, and Hippie Spiritual Gurus.
Therefore, their teaching techniques should obviously be called to question. It's little more than theoretical ideas.
But, this rule doesn't only apply to Extremists. Much of our material is based upon personal insight. SO, please bear this to mind.
And, most importantly, never tell someone that you're more knowledgeable than they, just because you've studied philosophical viewpoint in college. Because, in the end, it's an unproven science. And, although, there's some gain exploring these avenues, It doesn't carry definitive context.
Ladies are entitled to Speak their turn ----------------------------------------------
Let's suppose there's a general discussion. And, it's unrelated to matters concerning gender or politics. In any case, you'll still find some degree of bias.
For example: people tend to argue more briskly against the male. While Social Standards take an agreeable position to the woman, perhaps, out of sheer courtesy.
And, her ideas are easily accepted without fierce questioning.
Or, if someone occasionally disagrees with her, they'll always remain tactful in the process.
There are many unusual examples, as well. SO, supposing a woman interrupts a discussion, most men would gladly oblige without complaining. Plus, she continues to chat, while others listen. In fact, when women speak: it's somewhat difficult to "sneak a work into the conversation".
Also, Ladies are entitled to speak first, while the male should wait his turn. This is considered the 'right thing to do'. And..... people wouldn't give a second thought to follow this standard procedure. So, the term "ladies first" is more than just common courtesy. It also applies to conversation.
Most people treat men differently without even realizing it. Here's a truly interesting example of privilege: Supposing there's a debate between : you & myself. If this happens, I might try to make comparisons in order to better illustrate my point. In which case: you will promptly tell me that, [I can't go off on a tangent].
But, if this had been a woman making similar comparisons, you wouldn't have told her Not to 'make any tangents'.
Of course, this is not a major concern, and few would ever find urgency to complain.
but it's, yet, another way to challenge any theories claiming that "males are privileged". (version 2.0)
Difficult as it may seem to believe, there's an issue far worse than any previously mentioned.
Essentially, there's been a great deal of humorous literature, claiming that women rule the entire universe. They theorize a future where "Amazonian" women have absolute power. And, men are reduced to ashes & dust. Imprisoned into mini-cells. And, used strictly for 'breeding purposes'... If he's even necessary for that.
There's really nothing funny about this type of humor. Also, this issue is completely unrelated to New Age Concepts, such as Gaia or Mother Earth. SO, let's not mistaken "Planetary Domination" with maternal figures.
This concept was derived more from satirists than scholars. However, a few Scientists have welcomed the idea.
Ironically, they propose claims that women dominate. But, if such was the case, then it should warrant a movement to rectify this inequity. But, of course, this logic wouldn't be considered. Think about it. What if men in the universe were mistreated by a feminine Amazonian deity? This should be considered morally wrong, & promptly ended.
------------------------- Definition of Fascism: -------------------------
"A society: primarily of the Government, by the government, and solely for the government".
It would not be sarcastic to describe Today's Lobbyists as Fascists, by every literal sense of the word.
And, eventually, they'll create excuse for any measure of authority. This could very well include government control over the child rearing process.
(the above definition was devised by mensrightsmovement.net).
Who's to Blame?
---Pointing fingers, and always looking elsewhere.
Women often propose an argument claiming that "male leaders make poor decisions". SO, they're the reason why there's so much crisis in this world. And, women are better suited to making humane decisions than her male counterpart.
For starters: you'll notice that it's socially acceptable to make stereotypical comments against men.
Secondly, world problems are caused by factors, such as, lack of resources, overpopulation, and religious disputes. It would be easy to place most blame upon women, since females have historically wished to bear more children than suited for the land. SO, it would be just as easy to blame her for all wars, conflicts, and starvation.
This too, would be a silly notion. Obviously, everyone is to blame for the world's troubles.
However, there are many Extremists who actually blame men for Global Warming, since he invented factories driven by fuel sources. Obviously, everyone contributes to these problems. Only a true woodsman could deny responsibility. Yet, even then, previous generations had rigid & dangerous lifestyles. Factors, such as, infant mortality and early death.
(an expansion of the previous listing) -----------------------------------------------
For anyone who says that men cannot make rational decisions. Just consider: It's actually the woman who loses all self-control under quite marginal circumstances.
Thus, she's likely to make poor judgments.
Every man has experienced this on a smaller scale. He's watched several girlfriends displaying pure lunacy, without provocation. In fact, many people have finally come to acknowledge this.
She quickly loses control over her emotions, not him. Therefore, men should not be stereotyped as "blind thinkers". Many people hold this believe, just because there've been many conflicts throughout history. The previous article, "Who's To Blame", tackles this general issue. We are All contributing members to these problems. Each and every one of us. It's similar to environmental issues of today.
Where, certain individuals blame everybody else, ......even though, their habits are equally deplorable.
Chasing The Sun Away ---------------------------
During the 70's, the Activists maintained control over our daily lives. It was an age when, Women's Talk Shows ruled the television airwaves. This level of redundancy was outlandish.
More notably, was their typical approach of self-justification. Basically, they were given numerous guest-appearances. And, each time, the same routine was carried out. Women's Groups were repeatedly imposing lectures upon us. And, every time, there was a strong argument on her behalf.
SO, on any particular day, the outcome of each program remained static.. During that era, Feminists literally controlled a large portion of network television. But, while doing so, her dictation is considered appropriate & necessary. they're able to give excuses, each time they establish control over the media.
And, without exaggeration, they controlled the daytime talk-show scene for several decades.
But, it's far more complex than that. She was assumed to be correct.. Which supposedly gives authority to remain in control of the television airwaves.. But, without any particular issue, this soon became routine standard practice. Day after day, week after week, year after year. And, this was all done, while our precious children watched helplessly.
It's almost like, creating a storm cloud, and, Chasing the sun away.
But, in the end, this proves that women are not negatively stereotyped, as many would claim. The opposite is clearly true. Not only are women given the opportunity to speak out, but she's also considered correct in doing so. So, with that said, why do people claim she's verbally repressed ????.
(chasing the sun away, version 2.0)
Links to other articles. (written by fellow MRA's, other than myself)