In this section, Our goal is to list examples of social Imbalance, no matter how trivial it may seem.
And, we will casually add to this list, for several months time......
"GIVING UP RESIDENCY, is a form of Courtesy" ----------------------------------------------------------------
Whenever Spouses Quarrel, the man is supposed to sleep on the couch. Or, he must temporarily stay at a friends house. Most likely, he's spend the night sleeping in someone's garage.
Heaven forbid, should the couple ever divorce, he's supposed to find a new place to live.
And, even if the couple divides the home, she will remain on the premises during the courtroom precedings. Thus, for several months time, we would be forced to live in a small apartment, while the woman maintains her lifestyle. This happens to be a long standing social standard. Although, the media teaches otherwise, we need only observe similar habits of Elder persons from the early 20th century.
Admittedly, during our current century, there are cases when former husbands choose a more selfish outcome. SO, the automatic arrangement which protects the woman is actually becoming slightly less common. Thus, we're aware of some cases when men retain full residency. However, this was rare during the 1950's. Nonetheless, it's still uncommon for a man to retain his premises.
Most importantly, this surrendering of residency was voluntarily done by the male. And, til this very day, it's still the primary expectation. Thus proving: Feminine Privilege is considered to be a positive thing. And, it's never looked upon as an evil or Injustice.
"It's Just a Job! .....Nothing more, nothing less!" ----------------------------
Women are taught to regard their work as some sort of goddamn religion.
And, she's able to make a clear association between this, and the hype which it generates.
So, as a result, this dogma basically gives another major advantage to her.
but, since the 19th century, women have always been given similar privileges.
they've always been able to treat 'work' like a major [Woman's Issue]. It's truly been over-inflated.
No matter how odd this may sound, such aspects give a TOTAL advantage to women. (ver 1.01)
It's socially unacceptable for a man to wear Eye-glasses. While, in contrast, a lady is often considered more attractive & smart while wearing glasses.
Okay, so, itís not the end of the world. But, itís easy to imaging what "FemiThugs" would say if the double standard was reversed. Their conclusions would be melodramatic and severe. Theyíd first claim that "women are not given the mere right to see clearly". Until finally, itís then said, that women are expected to be blinded into submission. This might sound ridiculous. However, if it was more acceptable for men to wear reading glasses, (while, being less acceptable for women) this would produce literal Philosophical interpretations.
Whereas, I consider it to be a minor issue. But, still worth mentioning, nonetheless. (ver 1.01)
"The Typical Family Arrangement"
The mother has all the finest merchandise. She wears the best clothing, enjoys the finest dining & eating out, drives the nicest car, and, all products reflect her tastes. While, the husband generally expects very little materialistic wealth. His daily lunch consists of a stale sandwich, while, his wardrobe never changes, his car is a clunker, Plus, the weekly earnings are generally given to the female spouse. And, this does not reflect her spending habits. Thus, financial matters are used at her complete discretion.
"Doctor, Doctor" ------------------------
Many people have said that female Doctors are better than Male Doctors. Oddly enough, their given reasons often change. The most disgusting claim is that females are more professional. Whereas, a male would be more interested in being a womanizer. This silly idea eventually led to nowhere.
Then, people began contradicting the first claim, by stating that female Doctors are more thorough. And, indeed, this happens to be true. A female Doctor is more likely to give a complete physical, by telling the man to strip down to his briefs. Male Doctors, on the other hand, are less meticulous in this department. But, this shouldn't imply that women are better.
Obviously, people have no right to create unfair stereotypes. but, you'll notice that most people take liberty in expressing their biased views.
Finally, the truth is revealed. Many people admit that they prefer Female Doctors, FOR NO PARTICULAR REASON. It's just sexist.
Ironically, there's every reason to prefer a male Doctor. He's more knowledgeable, and experienced. But, most importantly, many Female Doctors are affiliated with Women's Groups, such as "The American Medical Women's Association". and, "Women Physicians Congress".
Plus, female Docs read gender-biased literature, such as "Journal of Women's Health".
Would you ever trust someone like that ???
SO, I rest my case !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's rather surprising that no one has taken notice of the government's use of DNA testing. From its inception, the practice has been used to violate the male body. And, contrary to popular claims, this is not related to so-called sex-based offenses. During the earlier days of DNA analysis, the male was solely targeted. However, this has since changed, to a small degree. DNA tests were performed for a large number of possible reasons, which included basic research. Sadly, The Media has justified this practice by using 'Criminal Justice' as an excuse. The Public should be fully educated into recognizing the overall discriminatory nature. This clearly violates his basic human rights. And, lessens his social dignity.
Well into the 21st century, there were a few cases requiring women to submit to DNA testing. But, it's important to remember the early stages of this medical practice. Males were quickly targeted for a varying number of reasons, not necessarily related to paternity or crime.
It's rarely mentioned, but, a primary issue must finally be addressed. If we pondered which is the singular most important concern...... several dozen possibilities would quickly be considered. But, there's a surprising topic which lands within My Top Three. One fact remains static, regardless of any specific issue. In every case, she always receives a great deal of 'special attention'.
For example: if a female works in a blue-collar profession, everybody makes a big hype about it. And, of course, whenever a woman is gainfully employed, she's likely to regard this as some sort-of 'big issue'. This rule also applies to anything which could possibly be imagined. The media gives special treatment for 'female joggers', 'women in politics', 'female bicyclists', 'Woman Athletes'.
Apparently, she can't go a single minute, without creating a spotlight for herself. Plain and simple: It's just Not fair.
Basically, with everything she does, this privilege always remains. And, such is why, I consider this to be amongst the top Three lingering issues. It doesn't seem like a terribly big deal. However, in a general sense, this problem never subsides. SO, it can be used again & again, day after day, for any ridiculous reason.
All Apologies. Always: "From Me, to you".
There are so many privileges given to her, It's difficult to comprehend. And, one such example: She can refuse to speak with him, until he either apologizes, or, admits he's wrong. Basically, society allows her to dictate these unreasonable terms. And, men usually comply, simply because she says so.... ...He'll do anything in order to make her happy.
Besides this, women also threaten to deny affection, until he agrees with everything she says. So, if she becomes upset during a minor disagreement, he will try to comfort her. In which case, she'll tell him to keep his hands off. Interestingly, most female readers would immediately regard this purely as a sexual innuendo. (probably because, women typically reach this type of racy conclusion.) (And consequentially, everything is falsely interpreted as a 'sexual issue')
Interestingly, it's not even necessary for her to make these demands. The male typically accepts things, from her perspective. But, nonetheless, she still threatens him with 'the silent treatment'. .... and , the reason is because, she's allowed to make these demands. (She's given the liberty to act this way. Society allows her to become vocal.)
Head Games: (on a more professional level).
(Example Of Gender inequity: # 368). ------------------------------------------------
Men's groups could devise a list of relevant issues, spanning several million. Here's just one-of-them:
During a marriage between a Male Psychologist, and his beloved spouse, he will Never try to use his professional skills against her.
While, in contrast, Life would become difficult for any man who marries a female psychologist. She would frequently play 'head games' based upon her field-of-expertise. Many guys have come to regard this type of woman as a "Stay Away" symbol.
You could speak with a man who's married to a psychologist, and, he'll acknowledge that she tends to 'analyze' everyone.... especially her husband. While, in contrast, you could chat with any woman who's married to a male Psychologist. And, in every case, his professional background never proves to be a factor. In conclusion, this is not a specific issue. Rather instead, women are usually given the liberty of trying to read your habits.
And, this same rule applies for other professions, as well. Such as, school teachers, Social workers, District Attorney, etc..... The personality remains with her, during her private life.
For any boy who's unfortunate enough to wear braces, this can be a traumatic experience for him. However, whenever a girl wears Braces, people often say, it looks cute on her. In fact, teenage girls are often considered more attractive, when she's got braces on. Interestingly, it's also acceptable for a girl to have buck teeth, as well. This is only considered to be unattractive, in boys. But, okay for girls. Perhaps, even sexy. Most disturbingly, studies have proven that girls smile alot more often than boys. This obviously suggests, that, girls tend to be happier, in every possible way. And, of course, this includes adults, as well as, youngsters & teenagers alike. Finally, clinical studies have shown that vastly more men suffer from depression. Hmmmm, I wonder why ?
A young man is walking in the village, along a narrow sidewalk. And, two ladies are walking near, from the opposite direction. But, the narrow path is only suitable for 2 individuals. So, instinctively, the man veers off the sidewalk, and steps into the high grass. This allows both ladies to pass along, walking side-by-side. And, so, onward they move, without giving a second thought.
In a separate incident, an older guy was entering an lending-agency, from the outside parking garage. However, there were a few narrow steps leading to the backdoor entrance. A moment later, a woman was leaving. and, drawing nearer to the stairway. So, without hesitation, the man stepped out-of-the way, while she continued along. Thence, after the woman had passed through, .....he then moved forward, and continued forward.
These are just a few examples of the extraordinary privileges which are given to her.
Who's Compulsive ? ------------------------------------------------- There are many discussions held by psychologists, which routinely focus upon the issue of human-sexuality. Psychologists are able to reach the masses, through-- literature,-- public speeches, --lectures, and --Youtube videos. During which, Virtually all of the positions are held by women, in this field of expertise. And, in many instances, they've even dealt into the topic of 'compulsive wankers'. (Yes, you heard that correctly.) Interestingly, in EVERY case, they always use a generic male as an example.
Please realize, there's a deliberate attempt to create imbalance between the genders. Essentially, they're placing men into role of lesser dignity. Thus, whenever a female-psychologist mentions this supposed addiction, she'll once again choose a male as the mindless sex-crazed dummy.
Basically, after witnessing several discussions on this issue, the same outcome repeats itself. Whenever a female psychologist discusses a disorder of sexual deviancy, they once-again choose to describe a male as the compulsive Wanker.
SO, it became apparent, the ladies were reluctance to EVER use a female as an example. Perhaps, these psychologists are not even aware of their biased approach.
Oddly, it's highly improbable for a man to stimulate himself with such fervor.
Rather instead, the woman's body is designed for this degree of stimulation. She can sustain sexual arousal for great lengths of time, on several occasions.
Yet, after all is said and done, it still shouldn't be viewed with negativity. If any woman chooses to become frequently aroused, that's her decision. And, cannot be judged as right or wrong. normal or abnormal. Who's to say?
Finally, this brings us back to the initial question: Who's compulsive ??? .....It surely ain't him.
The Evolution of ill-humor -------------------------------- It's really hard to believe, most dirty humor is still directed against men. Nowadays, you can visit websites from reputable psychologists. And, they'll commonly give sexual advice to men, by telling him to either use a 'blow up doll', or 'his left hand'. But, needless to say, these types of degrading remarks are never directed against women. Plus, even if the discussion became explicit regarding her bodily needs, they would always remain somewhat tactful, anyhow.
This overall problem has existed for many generations, spanning continents. However, in the 21st century, such demeaning language is now being used by --top authors, --celebrities, & -- psychologists. It's no longer confined to street-alleys, and informal discussions.
Thus, in a large sense, the problem has become alot worse, nowadays.
The Draft ----------- .....As a matter of fact, many countries require men to enlist in the Armed services. Many people consider this to be a laughable issue, but, he's taken from his comfortable home-life, and, forced into a difficult lifestyle.
There are other factors, such as home-sickness, loss of all privacy, communal restrooms & showers, plus, the shaving of hair.
More interestingly, men are never supposed to complain. And, he's also told to 'take it, like a man'.
And, oddly enough, she accuses men of griping over the entire issue, even though, he rarely speaks out.
She's grown tired of hearing about it. ......even though, the issue is rarely mentioned.
It seems, anytime there's a system which is favorable to her, she quickly prepares for an all-out debate.
Hats, scarves, & Red Caps ---------------------------
(example of feminine-privilege: #722,495)
We're all aware, that, it's unacceptable for a man to wear a hat whilst indoors. (this holds especially true for restaurants, churches, ceremonies, and other public events).
It's a relatively minor issue. But, there are a few aspects worth mentioning. Firstly, if the stereotype was historically reversed, it would've seemed terrible & degrading. Just imagine, if a lady from the late 19th century was expected to remove her hat, when entering a room. People would consider this to be an inflated tragedy.
Also, we're all aware that men are required to keep their hats off, during various ceremonies. And, honestly speaking, this has a larger affect upon his life, than you could ever imagine. There are some men who really need to wear hats. It's often an expression of his personality. And, he also looks much better. But instead, this standard literally disrupts his entire schedule. He must constantly bring this detail into consideration. Instead of merely being allowed to wear his damn hat. What could it possibly hurt ???
This overall rule applied to hats of all sizes. A man was supposed to remove his tiny golfing cap. While the woman is allowed to wear a large sombrero. Finally, it's not terribly important. But, men of the 19th & 20th century would often tip their hat, while a lady was present.
This was seen as a gesture of respect. And, bowing his neck was also considered the gentlemanly thing to do.
Indeed, Cheers to her......
A Small twist of fate ---------------------------
Men's Groups are only concerned with the most important issues. While, in contrast, women constantly deal with, even the most trivial concerns. For example: we've seen women complain, just because photos of attractive "super models" appear within her magazines.
Men's groups would never waste their time with such insignificant matters. He wouldn't care if male-models were depicted on every page of tomorrow's newspaper. It doesn't really matter, at all. ......Why should this bother me ? There's no reason to become angered.
Now, if only women felt the same way. Unfortunately, She thinks it's terrible, just because the media uses professional models to sell articles-of-clothing.
Male-models are also used to advertise products. and, ironically, these men are always in 100% perfect shape. Whilst, it's actually more acceptable for a female model to have imperfections. But, these details don't concern me, in the least.
After all is said and done, the media has given acceptance to heavy, full-figured women. While it's still unacceptable for a man to be over-weight. However, I'm still not really bothered by such minor issues. There are far more important things to discuss......
Ultimately, when women speak, people listen. So, she's given the right to complain. And, we accept those terms graciously.
And, even if it's no big deal, we're still willing to listen anyhow. Thus, if she becomes upset by images of fashion-models. Then we share her grief. We're always willing to listen, even if it's not fully understood.
So, whenever something matters to her, it surely matters to everyone.
.......And, that's the whole-wonder of it all !
A special treasure to behold. (.....telling an unlikely example of social privilege) --------------------------------------
When visiting a "woman's website', It was quite shocking to learn the degree of their obsession. They fabricate issues, which don't even exist. For example: claims that, mainstream media always makes women feel guilty about everything. Since when is she ever criticized or negatively portrayed by the media ???
These websites also discuss the pressures against girls to become anorexic. This too is not based upon practical reality.
But, here's what it all boils down to:
She's given the privilege of releasing her anger. ....without ever being criticized or ridiculed for doing so. and, that's a pretty good deal for anyone to embrace.
So, there's more to the illusion, than meets the eye. We must reexamine the act of raising an ire. For, this alone is an expression without restriction. And, these privileges are given strictly to her. It's a woman's prerogative to freely speak-her-mind.
And, within short times passing, she will exercise this liberty, once again.
Nature Sets Calmly into Motion -----------------------------------------
It's somewhat difficult to imagine, but: During previous decades: The 'Hippy Generation' spoke against the most unlikely forms of 'oppression'.
They actually considered a Woman's menstrual cycle to be a form of "injustice". And, many Journalists actually began writing in support of this idea.
Then suddenly, these biological functions were listed amongst examples of so-called 'oppression'. This also included the issue of 'pregnancy', as well. Whenever couples plan starting a family, the woman is "supposed to" bear the child.
These are NOT examples of oppression. A woman's menstrual cycle is a natural occurrence, and not the byproduct of a conspiracy by men.
And, the same fact holds true regarding the issue of pregnancy.
Strange as it may sound, many people have actually labeled these issues as forms of social inequality.
It's not uncommon for a staunch Activist to point her finger, and, to ask: "How would men feel, IF 'he was forced to bleed from his privates'?
They're attempting to define oppression by its broadest definition. it's almost as if, she wants to establish this overall belief. And this happens to be one of those ridiculous issues.
Now, let's reach a simple conclusion: nobody forcibly elected her to menstuate, or, to become pregnant. It's a perfectly natural biological function.
Partners in Crime ------------------------
Many debates have risen which suggest that men are violent creatures. Ironically, such claims are examples of unfair stereotyping. But, aside from that fact, a few points should be taken into consideration.
----Firstly, humans tend to be rather corrupt, by nature. And, this unfortunate selfishness has little to do with one's gender, or ethnicity.
----Secondly, we must consider the issue of abortion. Regardless of your position on this issue, one fact cannot be denied: women defend this issue with ferocity. For example: if you spoke one singular word against it, she'll often attack you, like a total maniac.
----third: Children tend to be nasty & cruel, from an early age. And, this proves to be common amongst boys and girls alike.
----Forth: virtually all girls think it's funny to punch, kick, or scratch a boy. They especially find humor in any type of pain inflicted upon the sex organs.
----Fifth: Women tend to prefer the most aggressive men. Therefore, her hands are just as dirty, as his. Typically: the schoolyard bully was always popular with girls. In other words: she preferred dating this type of boy. And, into adulthood, a woman seeks any man who's ruthless in the business world. And, needless to say, his personality will be undesirable.
---Sixth: Historically, the woman has preferred marrying a fierce warrior. This idea could reach a few differing conclusions. On a positive note: there was an overall necessity to be protected against invaders. Realistically: Warriors provided a richer lifestyle for their families. So, the vast majority were poor throughout the ages. While, in contrast, military men were rewarded vast wealth & property. On a darker note: evidence suggests that women actually preferred foreign conquerors, instead of the native-born man (who was often deemed 'less equipped'). For example: when the Vikings invaded Britain, native Anglo-Saxon women were often physically-attracted to these invaders.
---seven: throughout the animal kingdom, Usually, the female member-of-the-species is quite violent. (obviously, predators are male or female) (and, there's no distinction of moral conduct.) Plus, in many cases, the female happens to be more brutal. (such as, wasps, ants, spiders, crocodiles, & numerous other examples).
So, in conclusion: men & women are partners in crime. Both are guilty as one another. ------------------------------------ But, we can all make a difference. and, color the world with love. Everyone should spread happiness onto each other. It begins with yourself. and, that's how the world can change.
Certainly, not by placing blame upon anyone ! That's the key message, here.
SO, let's become partners for a worthy cause. "Kindness is all which truly matters in this world".
The Violent Species
Whenever arguing against a typical Activist, she will eventually promote the idea that, [men are fully responsible for all the worlds troubles].
This issue Always arrives, sooner or later. It's suggested, that he's the sole reason why things have always so "messed up".
Firstly, this is an unfair, sexist remark. And, it would never be acceptable to place negative stereotypes against women.
Also, nature tends to be unkind, by every general sense. And, it has nothing to do with ones gender.
Beyond all else, World affairs have more to do with political landscape than anything else. When numerous countries struggle for their own advancement, warfare becomes a likely result. On similar terms, specific ideals tend to produce similar results. For example: Communist countries seem to create strict laws. Capitalist nations have a large proportion of wealthy families. While creating unfortunate failures, as well. Virtually all economic & political ideas seem to create their own natural pattern. As well as, the topography of the landscape.
This certainly has nothing to do with gender.
But, many women insist upon pursuing this issue. SO, here's the response from Men's Rights Groups:
All the worlds troubles result from the members of society. We are all contributors to these problems. During the middle ages, both genders succumbed to ignorance and superstition. Also, Rulers of that era were ruthless, and crushed their opponents. This fact was true, regardless of one's gender, or ethnicity. And, a few hundred years later, the so-called "Victorian" beliefs were predominantly held by women, not men.
whether general attitudes accepted slavery, Capital punishment, or, anything negative. This happens to be an unfortunate aspect of humanity. Be a man, or a woman.
Did you know? Adolf Hitler & Josef Stalin were very popular amongst women ? In fact, Hitler was often admired as a Pop icon, ....comparable to Elvis or The Beatles.
So, in conclusion, There's always been many things wrong with this world. And, the entire human race is to blame.
-------------- Note: This article could explore issues which place primary blame upon women. But, that would defeat the overall message.
Here's just one example showing where this article could've lead toward: Historically, women always preferred to marry into prestiged families, regardless of their ethics. (But, let's not confuse the issue, any further)..
Partners in Crime II ------------------------
Here's a familiar story. Three boys in Junior high, go walking together, through the village, one evening. And, a group of bullies deliberately begin throwing stones and beer-caps into their direction.
Through it all, there was an interesting point to mention. The bad guys were accompanied by girls, while the innocent guys stood alone.
SO, although the ladies did not participate in the bullying, they chose to remain with them. And, morally speaking, they're every bit as guilty.
This is an all too familiar story.
Above Photographs : the 3 large "Holland" landscape pictures byBen Visbeek/ (Doblonaut) the 4 smaller "flowing stream" photos by G. Higgins.