Governments are expendable / ··cultures are irreplaceable.
The picture (to the left) shows how silly feminists can be. They're proudly flaunting a "woman's studies" shirt. Isn't that simply ridiculous ?? This is a recognizable feature. It began as terror tactics used by hardliners. But eventually, the concept worked its way into the mainstream. In 1993, an interview was conducted with a prominent Republican politician, Susan Molinari. During which, she was wearing "Woman's Studies Athletic Wear". Eventually, the theme fusing Women & sports launched a line of clothing:: TITLE IX athletic wear.
During those "Women's Studies Courses", we can only imagine if they include segments on the unknown soldiers. They served their countries, yet were never identified. This became a fact-of-life for millions of average men.
And, of course, those classes try to justify their presence by claiming that women are historically oppressed. This is a superficial political analysis, while ignoring our everyday social realities.
The government has steadily claimed ownership to many corporate functions. The following picture shows one example. Since their inception, Local Unions have been self-governed. But, this all changed in recent times. If you examine the document below, you can clearly see that New York State has taken control over an apprenticeship program. Please note: this is an invasion of a privately owned industry. And, it's all possible because women's groups demand to influence those professions which are deemed "predominantly male".
The media has directed a great deal of attention toward helping girls in under-developed countries. Journalists claim that girls are often overlooked. Thus, It's considered necessary to grant all financial aid primarily to girls. We've managed to obtain a photograph of an actual girl who's receiving weekly donations from American contributors. Here are a few things to notice:
1) she wouldn't be classified as a child. 2) She's not mal-nurished or starving. 3) The financial aid goes toward leisurely products, rather than basic necessities. 4) most importantly, she has chosen pink, "girly" clothing by her own free choice. This lovely girl went to local stores and purchased colorful shirts because she wanted to dress in this manner. Oddly, the media claims that girls are stereotyped to behave in a girlish fashion (and the conspiracy is brought upon by men).
5) finally, it's perfectly wonderful to help girls in 3rd world nations. However, the reasoning should not be deceptive. We've been taught that it's necesary to help girls because nobody cares about her. But, in truth, she's given priority because many societies give a special status to females.
This photograph seems unremarkable. It's a normal picture featuring two friends. And, they're establishing close ties to one another. So, in a sense, this ordinary picture represents a primary form of social privilege. Girls are given a unique opportunity. They greet by
Your Tax dollars at work:
If you've ever wondered why our government has an annual deficit, social activism is always huge factor. They're reckless over-spenders. Without any sense of reality. The side pamphlet shows one example how money is being spent. Please realize overall implications. Women's Groups actually believe they can influence government spending. And they're able to organize programs which require a fully-employed staff. ..often, promoting a meaningless theme, (who's sole purpose is celebrating womanhood).
More than anything, this serves as an example of employment discrimination. Thousands of Activists earn their living 'the easy way'. While, in contrast, there are only 2 Men's Advocates who've been able to sustain a meger living. It's somewhat interesting how this has never figured into the equasion. But, when looking at Feminized Literature & programming, it clearly represents a widescale form of employment discrimination (amongst other things).
In the following message, an "Anti-pornography" activist clearly states that prostitutes & sex workers should never be arrested. While, in contrast: anyone who purchases these services should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. (Actually, legislation is supposed to target against the source, rather than the patrons. So, for example, the penalty for dealing drugs is harsh, while it's a minor infraction to consume narcotics).
So, the following letter gives an indication of their Unjust goals. This also explains why Law enforcement has put emphasis on criminalizing males who visit brothels. Now, you've finally learned why this has become a primary goal of every major police-force. The reason is because Women's Groups are dictating their policies.
Hello Natasha. :-) Thank you for accepting my friend invitation. Please
feel free to subscribe to my channel as I will be uploading some more
videos soon about the harms of pornography, prostitution and sex
trafficking that perhaps you might find interesting. (And that I hope
to make reasonably viewer-friendly, while still respecting copyright
laws.) Peace and gratitude, AntiPornographyBlog - Non-religious. Anti-censorship. Pro-equality based sexuality. Pro-free speech. - Pro-education. (To reduce demand for pornography and the supply of it.) - Pro-reasonable regulation of pornography production. (For health and safety.) - Anti-legalization of prostitution. Anti-criminalization of prostituted adults and children. - Pro-criminalization of buying sex. (To reduce demand for prostituted & trafficked human beings.) - Pro-compassionate treatment of and rehabilitation for pornography performers and prostituted women, men and children.
The "Anti-Pornography Activist" actually posted the above message on the profile of a 14-year old girl. This is an example of inappropriate conduct, on their part. It's similar to the programs which have appeared on NBC regarding 'sex workers' and 'underground sex-trade'. The Journalists for NBC insist that such behavior is immoral. But, actually, they're handling of the matter is more inappropriate. They're exposing our children to strong, adult themes. And, this should not be allowed on nightly family-programming. It's having a negative impact on our children.
Also notice the sharp political connotations which our children are being exposed to. SO, any discussion pertaining to an unrelated topic, usually includes feminized propaganda, as well. Whenever the media debates issues, such as Adult films, Health care, Education, Sports, or what-have-you, they always manage to steer toward "gender relations". ......Yet, the public remains oblivious.
Most importantly, audiences prefer perverse themes over normalcy. For example: Television programs (such as Dr. Phil & Maury Povich) often featured adult situations in order to attract viewers. For example: cases where adolescent girls have several sexual partners. Or, "...a 14 year old girl who wants to become a stripper". Basically, crowds seem to enjoy this subject matter. While, also claiming to be appalled by it.
However, consider that classing programming has been replaced by strong sexual themes. Thus, 1970's variety shows would never be popular today (exampe: Lawrence Welk, Mike Douglas) as they're not considered interesting enough.
IN short: people enjoy watching those lustful, kinky stories.